It's amazing how many crazy people - and/or con men and bullshit artists - can fool enough gullible people to dress this well,...

"Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.-- Jonathan Leake, exposing another facet of NewAge thinking - apocalyptic climate hysteria - as a bigger fraud than even I ever suspected (and I suspected almost everything else) in The Times.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation."
"What seems incontrovertible at this point is that the global-warming industry (and it is an industry) is suffused to its core with groupthink and bad faith. For many of us, this is not shocking news. But it is shocking evidence. Proving bad faith and groupthink is very hard to do."
"What these e-mails reveal more than anything is the amazing group think of these people. They are absolutely, fanatically convinced of the theory and will go to any lengths to justify it. "

"In a skeptical world, with editors and reporters who actually worked to dig up the facts and put the claims made,...into context, there would be something more,...than a regurgitation of the same old things we've seen in [transcendental meditation] movement press releases for the past few decades, and quotes from both TM salesmen and specially selected consumers of their product.-- Mike Doughney, making me wonder how many global warming "scientists" are into meditation - "Every question is a perfect opportunity for the answer we have already prepared." - while already feeling, as I do, The New York Times is a NewAge mouthpiece, nothing like the TM-Free Blog.
The title, 'Can Meditation Curb Heart Attacks?' is one of those leading questions that snake-oil salesmen love, since they can then respond with the answer they've already prepared. In fact, that's the strategy of the TM sales pitch for decades, as founding TM salesman Maharishi Mahesh Yogi once stated during a TM teacher training course: 'Every question is a perfect opportunity for the answer we have already prepared.' The New York Times has set the stage, creating a vacuum into which the following stage-managed presentation perfectly fits. A better title might have been, 'Vedic theocrats claim introductory technique of their faith curbs heart attacks.' It would have from the beginning clarified who's making the claim, and the nature of the organization that's making the claim. Unfortunately my expectations of New York Times reporters aren't likely to be fulfilled in my lifetime; this is a sad benchmark of how poor the reporting is in one of the nation's leading newspapers today."
"The world's biggest animal sacrifice began in Nepal today with the killing of the first of more than 250,000 animals as part of a Hindu festival in the village of Bariyapur, near the border with India.
"Hey, I have no great desire to foul up the planet any more than the next person, but if in reality, [Global Warming's] all a fraud, it makes Bernie Madoff look like a Little Leaguer."
"Oprah Winfrey is going to announce on her live show on Friday that she will be putting an end to the hugely popular talk show in the year 2011.
"Adam LeBor’s excellent book, written with perfect restraint, explores how it came to pass that a staggering $65 billion imploded in December 2008 when Madoff admitted that his investment business was 'one big lie'.
"No one really knows what exactly the world climate will look like in the not-so-distant future, that is, in 2015, 2030 or 2050."
"Someone asked a great question the other day: Why is leftist Hollywood so enamored with dictators and socialism? You would think they would fear having their artistic expression stifled under a Castro or having all their wealth confiscated under Hugo’s socialist or communist regime. It seems counter-intuitive, no…? That’s a damn good question but erroneously based on the premise that we’re discussing normal people.
"Sarah Palin is no normal politician, and at the Associated Press, apparently 'Going Rogue' is no normal book.
"Even the pooch may be getting better treatment than Pops. In a separate Consumer Reports survey, 22% of women who expected to reduce their holiday spending said they would be cutting back on gifts for their spouse. Only 14% said they would cut back on gifts for their pets. Ruff."

"It is a remarkable fact that Al Gore has had a significant influence on public policy relating to science when he is, in fact, utterly uneducated in scientific matters and is of very limited intelligence.-- "John", illuminating the only metric that allows certain people to make fools of others - making money off of it - which, BTW, explains Oprah's popularity, too, at the Power Line.
On the other hand, he's gotten rich, so I guess the joke is on us."
"There was no single moment, [William] Yenner says, when he began to believe that the line between spiritual discipline and authoritarian control had begun to blur. But he contends that [Andrew] Cohen mandated – directly or indirectly – actions such as slapping the face of someone for showing too much ego or pride; banishing followers, at least temporarily, for alleged misbehavior; or requiring followers to shave their heads as a form of humility. In one incident recounted in the book, Yenner says a woman who spoke up to Cohen had red paint thrown in her face as punishment. To this day, says Yenner, it bothers him that he didn’t object.

"In the past 25 years, hundreds of children are believed to have died in the United States after faith-healing parents forbade medical attention to end their sickness or protect their lives. When minors die from a lack of parental care, it is usually a matter of criminal neglect and is often tried as murder. However, when parents say the neglect was an article of faith, courts routinely hand down lighter sentences. Faithful neglect has not been used as a criminal defense, but the claim is surprisingly effective in achieving more lenient sentencing, in which judges appear to render less unto Caesar and more unto God.-- Jonathan Turley, getting all "crazy in the head" about the law and how it treats parents sending their kids to Jesus - where the Lord's got a play set ready for them and everything - a message which isn't going to resonate much further than here, even though it's in The Washington Post.
Not only does this use place children at risk, it results in the troubling image of courts favoring religious parents over nonreligious parents in a nation committed to the separation of church and state.
Denying children critical care may be divinely ordained for some parents, but it should not be countenanced by the legal system. Until courts refuse to accept religion as a mitigating factor in sentencing in such cases, children will continue to die, neglected as an article of their parents' faith."
"There is a long and distinguished history of dooming. There has been preaching about the end of time since the beginning of time. The Apocalypse. The Rapture. End Times. Armageddon. Y2K. 2012. The possibilities are endless!
"False imprisonment, coerced abortions and embezzlement of church funds, of physical violence and intimidation, blackmail and the widespread and deliberate abuse of information."
"I'm happy we did the study, though I'm not exactly happy with the results."