So it turns out the very person now trying to sell us on the NewAge idea that "everything is connected" is the same person who tried to sell us on the idea this reality isn't real. Except there's one little problem:
What's actually connecting this hooey is the person doing the selling isn't real him/herself.
Folks, a confused person can only lead you to being confused.
Reality is fine - and we're not all connected.
Just as The Beat Movement was founded by a bunch of macho men who lost their way, leading to our current spiral into oblivion, today's ideological stretching exercises are being led by equally disoriented fools, determined to convince us their issues are ours - by any means necessary.
I wish this wasn't a fitting representation of where we are right now as a nation, but - folks - something's wrong! And everyone's looking around, even glancing at each other, but nobody's stopping the destruction occurring right before their eyes. Not even for the girl's sake.
This is partially why nothing works anymore. Kids who think they can do anything - and the adults who let them. Afraid to establish standards or boundaries. Afraid to be the adults.
I've posted this before (see the tag) but having run across it again - and hearing Aykroyd spouting his "spiritual" nonsense in the lead-in - I had to do it again.
Kevin Macdonald's Academy Award-winning "One Day In September" should be all that's needed to answer the question, "Why won't this year's Olympics be commemorating this tragedy?"
Ice-T Defends Gun Rights: "The Last Form Of Defense Against Tyranny"
(TMR readers have been taken down Rap music's Second Amendment Road, before,...who says this blog doesn't provide a service?)
“Consider . . . the famous carbon footprint that we all leave behind us. What is it, after all, if not the gaseous equivalent of original sin, of the stain that we inflict on our Mother Gaia by the simple fact of being present and breathing?”
Almost all NewAge cults, including Mormonism, push "alternative" medicine
Almost all NewAge cults mix and match beliefs, for instance Mormonism is a miss-mash of the major religions with some Joseph Smith inspired hooey thrown in ("reform" Egyptian) while Scientology claims you can be of a major religion while still being a Scientologist, and other NewAge cults grab from all the majors plus Eastern religions.
NewAger Rielle Hunter and John Edwards - “till death do us part and probably beyond,”
Mitt and Ann Romney - "spiritually" married even after death
Scientology - L. Ron Hubbard, liar and fraud, infiltrated the I.R.S. and died running from the law
Mormonism - Joseph Smith, liar and fraud, tried to take over the government and died in custody
Scientology - lied to get tax exempt status
Mormonism - lied to get tax exempt status and Utah declared a state
I saw this on Ann Althouse's blog, where she was announcing Sherman Hemsley's death, but immediately got fascinated by the Devil's NewAge lingo ("I think we're really connecting here in a positive way. And I'd like to cut through all of that victim/demon negative imaging, you know what I mean?") which is exactly how The Dark Lord would talk if he existed - using vaguely open-ended, thought-stopping language designed to put the "open-minded" at ease while he screws them. That's how NewAgers operate anyway:
Telling us to think only positive thoughts - not the consequences of dealing with evil.
I also predicted bad things once Newsweek was sold to yoga master (and former California politician) Jane Harmon - and now it's going digital only in what Drudge is calling "the death of print."
But I'm wrong about Romney and the Mormons? We'll see. I keep telling you cultism's a great clue to everything - because it touches everything - and, alas, it ultimately destroys everything it touches.
BTW - for the billionth time - we wouldn't have to witness the death of print (or journalism) if the editorial boards would simply report on NewAge accurately. There's a great story here - how the West has been fooled into killing itself - that could easily fuel sales into the next century. But it will never happen, because it requires those same editorial boards to out themselves as complicit in the deception, and they'll never do that.
Ann HATES when I point out my "firsts" - and, more importantly, the fact she didn't climb onboard when I said them merely because (shockingly) they made good sense.
I always wonder why she doesn't see these things when I say them - it's ALWAYS got to be her or some "authority." (Do I challenge her on the constitution?) I mean, as long as I've hung out on her blog, I've told her she's trapped in a NewAge Nazi cult, so why is she surprised, now, that believers would find "the Auschwitz look" appealing? (There was lots of Nazi/prisoner sex going on in those camps,...)
Today, if you look like you have even a smidgen of "meat on your bones" you're labeled obese by the cultists.
I've also pointed out on Ann's blog how NewAgers love to blame the victim - but people go for it, forming lovable mobs of "nice" torturers chanting the silly Hitler Youth slogan "Mind/Body/Spirit" at whoever doesn't go along.
Penn & Teller even got in on the act,...for a while:
I like how this article makes clear that things can be destroyed for wrong reasons - and the good guys made to be the enemy - all because cultists are "stuck on stupid" and can get lots of public back-up for their stubbornness:
The differences between any area of conventional and alternative medicine are diverse and profound.
Take neurology, for instance: here we have an organ-system, anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, aetiology and nosology all related more or less specifically to this field and that are all based on sound knowledge and rigorous science, as well as substantial evidence. None of this knowledge, science and evidence is static, but each has evolved and can be predicted to do so in future. What we knew about any neurological phenomenon 50 years ago, for example, was dramatically different from what we know today. All of this scientific discovery links up with the knowledge gathered in other areas of medicine to generate a more or less complete bigger picture.
In alternative medicine or any single branch thereof, we have no specific organ-system, anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, aetiology or nosology that is based on scientific discovery.
We also have few notions that are transferable from one branch of alternative medicine to another – on the contrary, the notions of homeopathy, for example, are in overt contradiction to those of acupuncture which, in turn, are out of sync with those of reflexology, aromatherapy and Reiki.
Instead, each branch of alternative medicine has its own axioms that are largely detached from reality or, indeed, from the axioms of other branches of alternative medicine.
In acupuncture, for instance, we have concepts such as yin and yang, life energies, meridians and acupuncture points, all of which fly in the face of science. Moreover, there is hardly any development these of concepts, which renders them akin to dogmas, and there is little evidence that the combination of all the branches of alternative medicine would add up to provide a sensible ‘bigger picture’.
If a scientist were to instill scientific, critical, progressive thought in a field like neurology, they would be greeted with open arms among many like-minded researchers who all pursue the aim of advancing their field and contributing to the knowledge base by overturning wrong assumptions and discovering new truths. On the other hand, if researchers were to spend their time trying to back up dodgy concepts or bogus treatments, they would most likely not be appreciated by the majority of the experts working in this field.
By contrast, if someone wanted to evaluate homeopathy, acupuncture or other alternative therapies in a rigorous and critical fashion, they would inevitably discover that many of the concepts are highly questionable, based on wishful thinking or beliefs that are so strongly held that doubting them is tantamount to a sacrilege. If this scientist nonetheless exposed these deficits to the world or conducted research that predictably fails to confirm what wishful thinkers had assumed, they would not make many friends among the proponents of alternative medicine.
If this scientist dedicated decades of hard work to these tasks, that person would become a thorn in the flesh of believers. Instead of welcoming the scientist with open arms, some disappointed enthusiasts of alternative treatments might even pay for defaming them.
On the other hand, if researchers merely tried to confirm the implausible assumptions of alternative medicine, they might well become the celebrated ‘heroes’ of this field.
Yep, so I'm regularly framed to be the bad guy - because I'm not willing to give-in to nonsense and, since I usually stand alone, I'm angry about it being pushed on us - while those indulging in quackery have all the friends in the world because they're always so "nice" about spreading misinformation in a culture/atmosphere that's (somehow) friendly to insane claims.
[Lawyer] Joseph Cordell, the co-founder of Cordell & Cordell, said women may also resort to a tactic few men employ: accusations of domestic violence. “It could be as little as a shove or a raised voice,” said Mr. Cordell.
One Universal Medicine student, Tamara, objected to the claim that it was a cult, saying she had reclaimed her life from an abusive relationship rather than losing herself to a cult.
Or, asked another way, how have so many people not gotten the memo on Tony Robbins and firewalking yet? Then again, I guess we ARE talking about NewAgers:
Twenty of them couldn't even immediately figure out fire-is-hot, after the first rube got burned.