Showing posts with label vatican. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vatican. Show all posts

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Bow Your Heads (And We'll All Come To Jesus)

"Top Vatican officials — including the future Pope Benedict XVI — did not defrock a priest who molested as many as 200 deaf boys, even though several American bishops repeatedly warned them that failure to act on the matter could embarrass the church, according to church files newly unearthed as part of a lawsuit.

The internal correspondence from bishops in Wisconsin directly to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future pope, shows that while church officials tussled over whether the priest should be dismissed, their highest priority was protecting the church from scandal."
-- Laurie Goodstein, showing Catholics and NewAgers have two things in common now - deliberate child abuse and a bizarre fixation on putting appearances over ethics - as they prey, and prey, and prey, for (what can only be called in the church) The New York Times.

I swear, I can't make this shit up,...methinks it's time to tear it down, kids.

"Deaf boys"?

It's over.

Monday, March 10, 2008

TMR File Dump, Part II

Lordy, Lordy - how am I supposed to do a file dump when the file keeps getting bigger? The busting of Eliot Spitzer just opened up a whole can of worms that I'm gonna have to ignore if I'm to make any headway. (Is Hillary going to start a war room to defend Spitzer? Is she going to give Spitzer's wife her feminist declaration, "There are worse things than adultery", now that another of her guys has been busted? Is Spitzer indicating how much credibility he has left, or what, in the photo above?) All I'll say, definitively, is I liked Spitzer and this sad day is shared by many. Especially his wife. Asshole.

Another smart guy who seems to have taken a fall is Ben Stein. He's got this silly new documentary, "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed,” which is about (stupid) alternatives to the theory of evolution. I can't believe he did it, since he's always struck me as brilliant, but there it is. My favorite two paragraphs in the article I found were these two that specify religion:

" Paul Lauer, head of Motive Marketing, which is handling publicity for the film, said that critics were not invited mostly because the film was not polished enough for professional scrutiny. He said that his company, which also marketed the 2004 film, 'The Passion of the Christ,' is reaching out to conservative leaders.

For example, Mr. Lauer said, Mr. Stein personally showed 'Expelled' to James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, which has a big following among right-wing Christians. (Mr. Dobson gave the film a thumbs-up.)"


Why do I like that part so much? Because it shows that, when you're dealing with religious types, whatever you're selling doesn't have to be "polished enough for professional scrutiny." Any ol' bullshit will do, as long as you spell Jesus' (or Buddha's) name right. (People like me, on the other hand, demand more.) And, while this ain't Pick On Religion Day, (everyday is Pick On Religion Day) I do want to abandon these articles now that they can be appropriately linked by subject matter:

"A 'modern-day Moses' who fleeced churchgoers out of more than £3.2million faces jail today."

And:

"At least 50 people in [India] have reportedly lost their vision after gazing at the sun looking for an image of Virgin Mary."

And:

"NEW YORK (AP) -- In a major shift, a group of Southern Baptist leaders said their denomination has been 'too timid' on environmental issues and has a biblical duty to stop global warming."

And - this one's the capper:

"Recycle or go to Hell, warns Vatican"

To which I reply, "This is Hell, Ratzinger!" Sorry. You don't have to actually read those articles. Let's just collectively shake our heads and (as the NewAgers say) "move on" before their influence swallows us whole.

*Oh - and a special message to Erik In Seattle: Dude, if you don't speak to me when I play there, I'ma kill Bill Gates!