Barack Obama: Terrorist "Educators" Are O.K.

“I don’t think there’s a statute of limitations on terrorist bombings,...If John McCain had a long association with a guy who’d bombed abortion clinics, I don’t think people would say, ‘That’s ancient history.’"

-- Steve Chapman, a columnist for The Chicago Tribune, on Barack Obama's association with Bill Ayers, in Scott Shane's pre-emptive strike against further end-game criticism (which was oh so helpfully released on a Saturday) in the New York Times.

In the same article, Tom Hayden (Crazy NewAge Jane Fonda's former husband and also a radical leftist) adds:

“If Barack Obama says he’s willing to talk to foreign leaders without preconditions, I can imagine he’d be willing to talk to Bill Ayers about schools."

Isn't that sweet? Like an unrepentant terrorist being put in charge of the education of children is just fine. What's next? An arsonist running the fire department? This article is such bullshit. A total attempt at a whitewash.

Barack Obama once said he met Bill Ayers when he and Ayers were picking up their kids from school. Are we to believe that Barack Obama, who has two daughters in elementary school, and a guy who was blowing up the Pentagon when Barack was 8 years old have kids the same age? Barack's obviously lying (or spinning) and, of course, Ayers won't talk - but we're supposed to believe Ayers would let a young inexperienced Barack (who the NYT claims Ayers hardly knows) run Ayers's multi-million dollar foundations, would roll out Barack's political campaigns at his house, and also make financial contributions to assist him in same? Would YOU do all that for somebody YOU hardly know? And why does Barack's story keep changing? Why won't Ayers talk? Why is everybody closely involved with Obama a crazy radical? What are they all hiding? (Check out that last link)

How stupid do these people think we are?



This shit just don't wash. Not for the presidency. The office is too important for the issue of an unrepentant terrorist and socialist, determined to spread his radical ideology through our schools, not to be cleared up, 100%. Barack Obama has nothing but radicals, socialists, and communists in his background - that much is clear - and he has to answer questions about them, completely, before he can be seriously considered dog catcher. That's how it's always been and there's no reason to change the rules because some people have got a bug up their asses for a black president. Show me another presidential candidate who made it through with the same type of questions and associations hanging over their head.

Like that bullshit NYT hit piece about John McCain's "affair", this report is so soft-headed I can't believe they even bothered running it.

It's like they think they still have credibility or something.