Showing posts with label Alexis de Tocqueville. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alexis de Tocqueville. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

It's A Talent To Be This Stupid: We've Been Working At It

It is odd to watch with what feverish ardor Americans pursue prosperity. Ever tormented by the shadowy suspicion that they may not have chosen the shortest route to get it. They cleave to the things of this world as if assured that they will never die, and yet rush to snatch any that comes within their reach as if they expected to stop living before they had relished them. Death steps in, in the end, and stops them before they have grown tired of this futile pursuit of that complete felicity which always escapes them.
--Alexis de Tocqueville 

This will be the second election in a row that I will have witnessed the peculiarly delusional manner of my own people, as an adult - and just like last time - I find it disturbing. Unlike the last time, it is fueled by the desperation of, both, the electorate and the candidate - each seeing what they want to see, each unwilling to listen. Rationalizing as fast as they can, not so much to stave off opposing opinions, but reality itself:

NARRATOR: The selling of the new, more conservative Mitt Romney began months earlier in Boston. 
MICHAEL KRANISH: Shortly after he passed the health care measure in Massachusetts in 2006, he took a walk across Boston Common, and he and his aides went to the top of the Ritz Carlton Hotel there. 
NARRATOR: Gathered at the hotel were a group of top Iowa Republicans. 
DOUGLAS GROSS: And I was impressed with him from the standpoint that I thought he understood big issues. But there were some things that still bothered me, and I wanted to talk to him about those things. 
NARRATOR: Douglas Gross is a Republican power broker in Iowa. In that key primary state, Gross can be pivotal. 
DOUGLAS GROSS: I was seated right next to him. He was at the head of the table. We had a very fine dinner. Ann was seated directly across from me. And I brought up the three M’s. 
NARRATOR: The three M’s— Mormon, Massachusetts, multimillionaire. 
DOUGLAS GROSS: I brought up the Mormonism first, and it didn’t cause a problem for me, but for a lot of evangelical Christians, particularly in Iowa, they didn’t consider Mormonism even Christianity. So they had a difficulty with it. He sort of dismissed that as an issue, really clearly didn’t want to talk about it. And so then I went to the next one, and the next one was money. 
MICHAEL KRANISH: “How are you going to connect to the average person? We’re sitting up here— you know, you’re very wealthy, your hair is perfect, your shirt is starched.” 
DOUGLAS GROSS: Mitt just simply refused to talk about it. He looked at me quizzically and dismissed it. Ann obviously felt I was insulting her husband and indicated that I was by asking that question. And the rest of the people in the room were sort of taken aback and shocked. And Ann left the room and didn’t join us for the rest of the evening meal. 
NARRATOR: It was their first exposure to Iowa straight talk. it wouldn’t be their last. 
DOUGLAS GROSS: In Iowa, they have this old phrase that when you stick a pig, it squeals. And I think I hit — I hit a sensitive spot.

This is a classic example of denial, arrived at partially because these Mormon angels from the planet Kolob - who insanely believe they'll receive their own planet upon death - see the rest of us as the pigs to be poked, and not themselves.
Mitt Romney and the people around him see campaigns as television marketing and voters as 
targets to be manipulated. Voters, they believe, make up their minds late and will be swayed
 with saturation television advertising. The campaign managers seek – daily it seems – for a 
magic bullet to force on the electorate that will move undecided and weak voters to Romney.
 Policy papers, positions are rare and short on content and meaning. 
I’ve tried to track Mitt Romney’s shifts – some 180 degrees others 360 — on key issues during
the campaign. I’ve stopped at 30: abortion, stem-cell research; climate change and global
warming; campaign finance; and equal pay for women are just a few. 
George Romney was a political risk-taker. He fought for a new Michigan constitution that was
narrowly approved, overhauled the administrative structure of the executive branch in Michigan
and battled repeatedly for an income tax. His campaigns were uphill – particularly in 1964 when
he faced the Lyndon Johnson national landslide. In that year he increased his plurality while the
rest of the GOP ticket was crushed. 
As you campaign, so shall you govern.That lesson from father to son, seems to be lost in the
 win-at-any-cost fog of politics in the 21st century.

I'm quite used to the cynicism of cultists, but when the general public joins them (defined in this election - just as in the last one - by the words, "I don't care") it unnerves me. I thought my fellow Americans better, smarter, more set in their ways, than to be so easily moved by the prevailing winds.

A Billy Graham Evangelistic Association article labeling Mormonism a cult has been removed from the group’s website following the 93-year-old evangelist’s meeting with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney last week. 
Graham, during the meeting, pledged to do “all I can” to help Romney get elected. 
That website article listed as cults “Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, the Unification Church, Unitarians, Spiritists, Scientologists, and others.”

Now is the time of people saying anything, and doing anything, to align themselves not with the truth, but as our cults see the truth, ignoring even the voices of those from within.
Steven Fales effortlessly drops one-liners and other hilarious gems. He says that “Mormons are wannabe Jews” when discussing Mormons interested in theatre and involved in theatrical business. He also reminds the audience that “Mormons were here before L. Ron Hubbard. We are the original Scientology.

I don't know what to do about self-delusion, especially on a mass scale, when so many want what the con men are selling, whether it be "Hope" or "prosperity" or whatever other ephemeral candy these new political spiritualists claim they can pull out of their hats. With so many, like children, willing to be fooled, over and over, until they finally collapse in tears, there is nothing to do but resign myself to the sidelines and await their final realization it was all a game to begin with - a game for power - and the joke has always been on those who refused to exercise it. In this case, "We The People," buoyed by the non-judgemental culture they've created in the face of continual inconsistencies.
[Jesse Jackson, Jr.’s] focus has always seemed to be in Chicago, rather than in Washington. He displayed a different persona in each place, former associates say. In Washington, “he never became a player,” a top Democratic aide said. He struck colleagues as erratic. They’d see him late in the evening, walking the hall in martial arts gear, but miss him at meetings. On karaoke night at the Democratic Club, he could wow friends with his deft dance moves, but at other times he would retreat from social contact, according to interviews with several top Democratic aides. 
“He’s not a creature of the Hill,” one top aide said. “Jesse came with a lot of fanfare because of his name. That brought a certain level of expectation. I think there’s a sentiment that he’s never lived up to it.” 
But if he was perceived as irrelevant in Washington, he had real swagger in Chicago politics. “He fights all his fights on the local level,” said Debbie Halvorson, a Democrat who served with Jackson in the House before losing a reelection bid in 2010. Halvorson was soundly defeated by Jackson in a Democratic congressional primary in March. 
“He is very talented and he was building his own machine; he was like the prince on the South Side,” Coconate, the political operative, recalled. 
Building a power base 
The prince was erecting the foundations of a power base, diving into countless local races by endorsing candidates, seeding the region with mayors and other local officials who would be loyal supporters. But he could be mercurial, former associates say. Jackson sometimes boasted that he was a reincarnated Greek chariot driver, Coconate said. “I really thought he had a problem with reality,” Coconate said.

No stranger than another flip-flopper, with name recognition, who thinks he'll eventually get his own planet - these are the politicians put in place - so it's not they who have "a problem with reality," but the gullible believers who elect and support them, ever convinced their chosen one's power-coupled-with-madness reality will never pose a problem for themselves:

Practice makes perfect, I guess,...
 

Friday, March 7, 2008

Hey, Democrats, Those Are Some Candidates You Got There: A Black Man Who's Afraid To Fight And A White Woman Who's A Thug!

"Voicing the facts would violate party politesse. So [Obama] loses the No. 1 case against her. But by losing the No. 1 case, he loses the No. 2 case: that she is the most divisive figure in the country, and that this is true because people have reason to view her as dark, dissembling, thuggish.

One Obama supporter on TheRoot.com apparently didn't get the memo. That is the great threat to the Clintons, the number of young and independent Democrats who haven't received the memo about how Democrats speak of the Clintons. Writer Mark Q. Sawyer: 'If Obama won't hit back, I will. Why aren't we talking about impeachment, Whitewater and Osama?'"


- Peggy Noonan, writing for The Wall Street Journal

" There are people in Europe who, confounding together the different characteristics of the sexes, would make man and woman into beings not only equal but alike, They would give to both the same functions, impose on both the same duties, and grant to both the same rights; they would mix them in all things-their occupations, their pleasures, their business. It may readily be conceived that by thus attempting to make one sex equal to the other, both are degraded, and from so preposterous a medley of the works of nature nothing could ever result but weak men and disorderly women."

- Alexis de Tocqueville (July 29, 1805 – April 16, 1859)

People are saying Barack and Hillary should run together. I thought they did already - like bad watercolors.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Do You Think I'm Sexy?

"Instead of getting married again, I'm going to find a woman I don't like and just give her a house."

-Rod Stewart

There are people in Europe who, confounding together the different characteristics of the sexes, would make man and woman into beings not only equal but alike, They would give to both the same functions, impose on both the same duties, and grant to both the same rights; they would mix them in all things-their occupations, their pleasures, their business. It may readily be conceived that by thus attempting to make one sex equal to the other, both are degraded, and from so preposterous a medley of the works of nature nothing could ever result but weak men and disorderly women.

-Alexis de Tocqueville

STAMPING OUT FEMINISM

An attempt to stamp out feminism will have less of a chance of success than an attempt to stamp out cold; neither of them exists. The absence of heat produces cold just as the absence of light results in darkness and the absence of sound results in quiet; however, there are no entities such as cold, darkness, and quiet; they are the effects of a lack of heat, light, and sound. There can only be one assertive influence causing any condition, if there were two, constant conflict would ensue. If darkness were an entity it would constantly fight light. The same conflict would occur if quiet or cold were entities. The attempt by government to legislate the receptive feminine entity into an assertive influence has created such a conflict. The effect of this legislation has produced an effect called feminism.

Feminism is an effect such as malnutrition, diabetes, and cirrhosis of the liver; they are all symptoms, not entities unto themselves. Feminism as been likened to evil, which is also an effect, it is the absence of good. No amount of legislation can eliminate the evil that ensues from the absence of good. The United States has more lawyers per capita than any nation in the world and more laws; it also has more men in prison. Our nation has a high incarceration rate and high rates of various types of crimes. It has a high level of teenage pregnancy, unwed motherhood, divorce and adultery. Drunkenness, debauchery, and crime continue to grow in all areas. We have reduced our ability to create good. The greatest societal good comes from the family and there can be no family without patriarchy. The legislating away of the power of men has destroyed the cohesive and assertive power necessary to build family. The government has taken away all authority of men and reduced their function to that of a work unit. Consequently the family has collapsed and all morality along with it. The United States has the most violent boys in the world; putting more of them in jail has not decreased the violence, it has increased it.

The laws that the government have created are an effect of Western man not having an understanding of the universal patriarchal order nor an ability to implement it on the rare occasions that he does understand it. His thinking is feminine oriented and like a woman he too considers himself to be a victim of all things. Poor Western man, his life has been torn asunder by those bad feminists. To address his grievances he goes to the very government that created the conditions that he complains about, an action similar to a slave calling upon the master to improve his working conditions; it doesn't happen.

By removing the power of men the government has done the equivalent of removing the sun from the solar system. Without a sun there will not be any energy for nurturing to take place, the planets will fall out of orbit, chaos will ensue, and the solar system will collapse. Likewise our society has lost its virility, nurturing has decreased, women have lost all sense of propriety, and our society is collapsing. No amount of government intervention can change this condition. Only virile men who will rise up and assume their familial responsibilities can create the conditions where nurturing can take place and good will develop.


-Elder George