Showing posts with label dick morris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dick morris. Show all posts

Sunday, November 11, 2012

"Scammer Sells Woman A Mirror For $200 As An iPad"

Five delusional right-wingers who have Mitt in a landslide 
Most national polls have the two candidates in a dead heat, but try telling that to these would-be prophets 
Republicans have decided that all the available evidence must be wrong and that Mitt Romney is headed for a certain victory next Tuesday. Many expect a landslide win that will rival Reagan’s ten-point victory over Jimmy Carter in 1980. It’s hard to recall another example of an entire political party deluding itself to such a degree that it has lost any connection to objective reality. 
Romney can certainly win this election. There is no doubt about that. But he is just as certainly the underdog. Talking-Point Memo’s Poll Tracker currently projects Obama to win 285 Electoral College votes to Romney’s 191 (270 wins the White House); without toss-up states, Real Clear Politics has Obama with 290 Electoral College votes; Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight model gives the incumbent an 80.9 percent likelihood of victory; Sam Wang at the Princeton Election Consortium is even more bullish, projecting 318 Electoral College votes for the president and giving him a 97 percent chance of winning re-election. 
Many conservatives simply refuse to accept this state of affairs. There are two reasons. The party hacks – including those in the Romney campaign – worry about turning out their base. People like to vote for winners, and if they believe their candidate is likely to go down in defeat, they may decide to stay home and do some laundry next Tuesday. They fear that if their candidate looks like he will be beat it can create a self-fulfilling prophecy. Projecting an image of a strong candidate with good momentum keeps their voters engaged and enthusiastic. 
For the rank-and-file, there’s something else going on. Research suggests that political conservatives tend to have a greater need to avoid cognitive dissonance than liberals. The right has spent 4 years painting Obama as not only a failure and an incompetent, but a dangerous radical; a crypto-Muslim with dictatorial tendencies who may not even be an American citizen. The idea that such a horrible monster could be re-elected causes painful cognitive dissonance, which they’re trying to manage by grasping at any straw they see. 
This can lead to some truly comical efforts to twist reality into something that conforms with their world-view.
-- JOSHUA HOLLAND [emphasis mine] ALTERNET, NOV 3, 2012


Ahh, the delusional and their effect on the world. One of my most often referred topics.

Is Oprah a way of life?

Really, I'm on them so often - if you click the tag, below, marked "delusional thinking" - 
the blog will probably just reprint itself.


And then, right alongside self-delusion, there's fraud, fraud, fraud, wonderful fraud 


Where would we be?


A funny thing about fraud - no matter how many times the marks get taken - they keep coming back for more, rarely going to the authorities, and usually keeping quiet to others 
(so nobody will know how stupid they were) 
which is stupid, because then they leave others ignorant to what's going on and open to fleecing.

The GOP seems willfully clueless. There’s a reason there are so few minorities in the party. There’s a reason women scrambled to the other side. There’s a reason Hispanics, including even Cuban Americans this time, went for Obama.

How can Seven-Up be sued, over making alleged false claims
but Dick Morris and the rest of these know-nothings aren't?


I think the unspoken rule is, in America, nobody can speak about the obvious.
You've got to fight for that.


So we are a nation of nutjobs, viciously led to feeding on one another, 
and hardly anyone dares say a true word.


At this point, many might not even be capable of it.


For them, the real is fake and the fake is real.

Althouse: About David Petraeus: "The man falls in love with... himself!"

I've got to give that one scammer credit, though:

More than anything else, money, iPads - you name it - right now, 
what this culture most desperately needs is a mirror,....
 

Thursday, October 16, 2008

"Senator Government" Has Gone Too Far

Television news is insane. Right now I'm watching CNN, Hillary Clinton is speaking, and in the lower left bumper it says: "Fact: John McCain says Barack Obama's policies are 'class warfare.'" Well goodie. What does that tell you? Does it tell you if John McCain is lying? What is the "fact" CNN thinks they're informing us of? That John McCain spoke? Well how helpful, huh?

Flipping between three stations (CNN, MSNBC, and FOX) not one station so far, and I've been watching now for about a half hour, has mentioned the many lies Barack Obama told - with Obama openly denying his career started in Bill Ayers's home being the biggest whopper. All three stations are discussing how the candidates looked, like the reporters have no responsibility to inform anyone of anything. I mean, on CNN I'm counting 17 "journalists" around a table, and not one of them is dissecting the truthfulness of the answers. So why are they there? Are they all just window dressing? CNN must have a lot of money to throw away, if they're just paying people to sit in front of computers onscreen for nothing more than us to look at them.

I understand the Kennedy/Nixon effect, where Kennedy beat Nixon because he looked healthier than Nixon, but this is 2008 - not the advent of television - so why are the news channels still limiting themselves to that crazy standard? "Who looked better?" How about who told the truth? Barack Obama did say he would take matching funds - he lied. Barack Obama did say he would do 10 town halls "anytime, anywhere" - he lied. Barack Obama denied he was going to fine small businesses over healthcare - he lied. He denied he started his career in Bill Ayers's home - he lied. Barack Obama made like the founders of the Annenberg Foundation served on a board with he and Bill Ayers - rather than just awarding a grant to "professor" Bill Ayers without knowing who he was - which was a lie. Barack Obama didn't deny funding ACORN through The Woods Foundation. Are you catching my drift?

Seriously, as I'm watching - and I almost hate to admit this - the most informed pundits on television news, so far as I've seen, are the pundits on FOX: Sean Hannity, Dick Morris, and Karl Rove. They seem to be the only talking heads who know the landscape of the Ayers issue, for instance; knowing it's not merely an issue of who Ayers killed in the '60s but what the terrorist got Barack Obama to do today: namely dispensing the Annenberg's $50 million in funds for Ayers, allowing the terrorist's radical ideas to be disseminated in schools with no educational benefits what-so-ever for the children of Chicago. That covers four issues negatively for Obama: character, judgment, intelligence, and effectiveness.

So what did I think of the debate itself? I think Obama was smoother, but in the end, it'll be good for McCain because he got the ready soundbites for video - "Joe The Plumber" is going for John McCain and we'll be seeing a lot more of him as "The Average Joe". Obama's clear lies will be exploited - especially Obama's Senate roll-out in Ayers's home, etc. Basically, I think the question of trust is still hanging over Obama, which opens up other opportunities for the McCain campaign in the next 19 days. And with Hannity, Morris, and Rove hammering home the truth, this race is wide open and Barack Obama's got problems.

So McCain did what he had to - and Obama's, still, got some 'splaining to do.