Monday, May 5, 2008

Sorry: No Lifeline 'Till You're Out Of Reach

"Burrow through a copy of your favourite daily newspaper’s classifieds section these days and you’ll stare into the abyss of alternative “healing”.

Herbalist Prince Fahad Mama Farida wants to sell you a magic stick that will make you rich in seven days. Prince Wakho (sic) offers safe abortions and better pay, while Prof Dunga proffers good grades and no disappointments. Penis enlargement, return of stolen goods and “mutti to move underground and fetch riches” are just a few more of these wonderful “herbal” potions on offer.

But any puffed-up self-righteousness over such shameful exploitation of the weak, the desperate and the ignorant just doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. Just look what we the middle class are forking out for: tarot, astrology, psychic reading, channelling, crystal therapy, feng shui, chakra balancing, peace dancing, mindfulness training, angel card reading, numerology, scarab reading, sacred geometry, past life regression. The list goes on and on.

And I ask myself: now which one of us really is the ignorant, superstitious, pathetic loser?

I was almost tempted chuck homeopathy into the pot as well, no thanks to a book I have just read, an ugly little volume that turns the knife deep into the alternative health sector. Suckers: How Alternative Medicine Makes Fools Of Us All, is a nasty, sneering piece of work written by a venal cow called Rose Shapiro that pierces the heart of homeopathy and a slew of other non-orthodox treatments (chiropractic and Bach flower remedies are savaged especially brutally).

Homeopathy gets so thoroughly trashed by Shapiro that I am left reeling on its behalf even though I too am a sceptic. Imagine a treatment where the dilution of the active ingredients is such that there is a good chance that not a single molecule of the stuff is actually left in the tot of brandy that makes up the rest of the heavily shaken-up mixture. Like heals like? In Shapiro’s view, more like dumb deceives dumber. Her notes about the founders of homeopathy and chiropractic make you wonder whether the lunatics really did take over the alternative asylum.

Shapiro’s nasty little paperback left me angry and resentful. Orthodox medicine wins by default in this one-sided healing contest.

Can someone please come to the defence of homeopathy?"


-- Bruce Cohen, screaming for NewAge assistance, in a book review for South Africa's Thought Leader

3 comments:

  1. "good chance that not a single molecule of the stuff is actually left in the tot of brandy that makes up the rest of the heavily shaken-up mixture. Like heals like?"

    so: Scenario 1: if there are 0 molecules left in the mixture, then it heals nothing. (I believe PandaBear (the blogger who shall not be named) waxed poetic in his (own) comments section about the virtues of tap water.

    Scenario 2: there is 1 molecule left. So are you saying that if there as 1 molecule, that that would heal something?

    I'd just like to point out that the difference between 1 and 0 is very small.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not sure whether that defended homeopathy.

    So if "like cures like" and you had 1 molecule, what would it cure? I think that is the crux of the question.
    We need a chemist!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're a nut. But I love it sometimes.

    Thanks for the laugh.

    ReplyDelete

COMMENTS ARE BACK ON