"It strikes me that Obama’s victory, and the way it is being celebrated as historic in public debate, shows that America has entered an era of racial etiquette more than of racial equality.
The key part of Martin Luther King’s speech in Washington in 1963, when more than 300,000 blacks and whites marched on DC ‘for jobs and freedom’, was his description of a future in which black people ‘will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character’. It was a clear, eloquent argument against racism. Yet today, Obama is judged both by the content of his character (in lieu of any clear political programme, he is championed for being charismatic, warm, well-spoken) and by the colour of his skin. Indeed, some white liberal commentators have openly said that part of the reason why they voted for Obama is because he is black – which seems to me the very opposite, or at least a serious warping over time, of what King and others in American history tried to achieve."
-- Brendan O’Neill, saying the kind of thing the Cult of Obama doesn't like to dwell on, in Spiked!.
I will not be judged by the colour of my skin but by the content of my character, and - if you, too, could care less - decide I'm "green" and give a little bit to:
No comments:
Post a Comment
COMMENTS ARE BACK ON