David Wiegand has started an interesting conversation, about cover tunes, by stating "there are some songs that I just don’t want to hear again." I'm fascinated because - while he insists covers are everywhere - I never hear them anywhere anymore. I think what we have here is a semantics issue, and David Wiegand is incorrectly labeling the bad art he hears:
See, I hear tons of bad "copies," in this shitty American Idol/The Voice/etc. travesty of a culture we inhabit, but absolutely no actual "covers" to speak of. Let me show you what I mean:
This is The Rolling Stones doing their original hit song, "Satisfaction".
And here's some TV fag, with a haircut, copying it.
Now, here's Devo doing their "cover" of the same song.
Notice it's vastly different, but - most importantly - it's ALSO original in it's own right.
Here's another loser - too dumb not to play it straight - and also playing to what sounds like some god-awful drum machine programming.
And here's some Country pickers covering Pink Floyd pretty well. Not brilliantly, but alright.
My point is - if you want to claim a vibrant culture - there's no way anybody should be copying anything (except for parodies, which is all copies are) and also be expecting praise as an artist.
These people are not artists. I know artists, and haven't seen one of us in a long, long time:
I see lots of brain-dead parrots, but that's about all,...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAWl5peI8HY
ReplyDeletePW