I know - because I'm into facts - that everything I've said about Mormons, in the past, will be validated:
Thanks for the admission, cultists:
Now, what I don't know is if my attackers - people who called me a bigot, like Ann Althouse, and Glenn Reynolds - will ever mature enough to publicly apologize,...
He has a friend, or perhaps he is a life partner, who is an Indian. Crack cannot be a racist - Tonto proves that.
ReplyDeleteMeade is jealous, because he is stuck with a female impersonator.
ReplyDeleteYou all just need to stop.
ReplyDeleteAnd yeah, that includes making comments about the ethnic/racial composition of people's spouses/significant others/whatever, or comments in general (since "female impersonator" and other things seems to be popular too).
It's rude, and it's boring -- and it certainly isn't constructive.
Just an opinion.
PW
PW,
ReplyDeleteThis isn't a constructive blog.
The only interesting thing about this blog is watching a lazy, failed black man descend into madness.
Crack's Big Man dreams in the music biz collapsed and he's found the scapegoat... whites.
Now, he's in the process of convincing himself that violence and thievery are justified responses.
I come here to view the wreckage, and for the early warning system. The Obama Fix didn't work. Reason... whites are not responsible for the failure of blacks.
Blacks won't accept this. They'll just double their efforts to scapegoat whites. Crack is the early warning system for the approaching violence.
I find this blog useful now as a place to see what the enemy plans to do. I plan on defending myself and my family. I'm not going to be an easy mark.
Oh for pity's sake.
ReplyDeletePW
Thomas, might I conjecture that some of the commentors here do their very best to make sure this is not a constructive blog, thanks to their repetitious belligerence? A belligerence that has little foundation in any logical thing and seems to stem from a self-imposed (although to be fair, likely influenced strongly by outside forces) siege mentality, or so it seems.
ReplyDeleteRather than having civil conversations about any matter of thing, instead there is the equivalence of school yard trash talking -- really nasty trash talking...but the opportunity to have that civil discussion is still there if people would just make an active decision to have it.
Dissenting opinions are part and parcel, but they have no weight if they aren't grounded in the truth and bear some responsibility to following the basic rules of debate -- which means they don't shout vulgarities at the drop of a hat and are willing to listen to the other side.
One never knows what can happen if this is allowed -- the opposite of this is at this point well illustrated.
PW
"Thomas, might I conjecture that some of the commentors here do their very best to make sure this is not a constructive blog, thanks to their repetitious belligerence?"
ReplyDeleteThe one person who gets it - as always.
I can go as long as long as they can,...