Showing posts with label Mumia Abu-Jamal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mumia Abu-Jamal. Show all posts

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Listening To The Artists (Being Held Up As Heroes,...)


 Let me be clear - she is not talking about me:
Met him on a Thursday 
Sunny afternoon Cumulus clouds, 84 degrees 
He was brown, deep 
Said he wanted to talk about my mission 
Listen to my past lives 
Took me on long walks to places where butterflies rest easy 
Talked about Moses and Mumia 
Reparations,...
O.K. - I'd had enough. Reparations? Good luck with that. And she's bright enough to know the difference between clouds, but not between bullshit, like past lives and reality. Incredible.

But people still wonder why I'm not looking for a relationship - listen: 

If long afternoons, discussing nonsense, turns women on - I'll leave 'em "off"...
 

Sunday, November 28, 2010

The Key To The Crazy House (Us Wanting Out)

Sometimes it becomes too difficult to read certain articles because TMR's buzzwords will be littered everywhere, making it so we think the piece should end with "read The Macho Response and see!" Of course, that would be silly because, whether we're right or wrong - and, like Rush Limbaugh, we're "right 99.7% of the time" - we know nobody's really reading this blog:

It's all about the photos. (In their wisdom, most read MSNBC.com.)

Anyway, a fine case-in-point is this column in the Globe and Mail by Margaret Wente, entitled, "Can environmentalism be saved from itself?"(The answer is "no".) After a few paragraphs we stopped reading, and started typing, because it's so obvious the writer is "singing our song" there was no need for us to go on.

We've pulled a major huge quote for you, and put our regularly-referenced phrases in bold, so there's no mistaking what we and Miss Wente are identifying as the real problems with environmentalists and their cult movement:
Maybe it was just a bad dream.

Just a year ago, 15,000 of the world’s leaders, diplomats, and UN officials were gearing up to descend on Copenhagen to forge a global treaty that would save the planet. The world’s media delivered massive coverage. Important newspapers printed urgent front-page calls for action, and a popular new U.S. President waded in to put his reputation on the line. The climate talks opened with a video showing a little girl’s nightmare encounter with drought, storms, eruptions, floods and other man-made climate disasters. “Please help the world,” she pleads.

After two weeks of chaos, the talks collapsed in a smouldering heap of wreckage. The only surprise was that this outcome should have come as a surprise to so many intelligent people. These people actually seemed to believe that experts and politicians have supernatural powers to predict the future and control the climate. They believed that experts know how fast temperatures will rise by when, and what the consequences will be, and that we know what to do about it. They believed that despite the recent abject failure of Kyoto (to say nothing of other well-intentioned international treaties), the nations of the world would willingly join hands and sacrifice their sovereignty in order to sign on to a vast scheme of unimaginable scope, untold cost and certain damage to their own interests.

Copenhagen was not a political breakdown. It was an intellectual breakdown so astonishing that future generations will marvel at our blind credulity. Copenhagen was a classic case of the emperor with no clothes.

Mercifully, nobody will pay attention to the climate conference at Cancun next week, where a much-reduced group of delegates will go through the motions. The delusional dream of global action to combat climate change is dead. Barack Obama’s cap-and-trade scheme is dead. Chicago’s carbon-trading market is dead. The European Union’s supposed reduction in carbon emissions has been exposed as a giant fraud. (The EU is actually responsible for 40 per cent more CO2 today than it was in 1990, if you count the goods and services it consumed as opposed to the ones that it produced.) Public interest in climate change has plunged, and the media have radically reduced their climate coverage.

The biggest loser is the environmental movement. For years, its activists neglected almost everything but climate change. They behaved as if they’d cornered the market on wisdom, truth and certainty, and they demonized anyone who dared to disagree. They got a fabulous free ride from politicians and the media, who parroted their claims like Sunday-school children reciting Scripture. No interest group in modern times has been so free from skepticism, scrutiny or simple accountability as the environmental establishment.

Perhaps some good will emerge from the wreckage. (Humility, for example.) Now that global warming has stopped sucking all the oxygen out of the room, some of those who care about the planet will turn to other – and more pressing – problems. There are plenty. Humans are encroaching everywhere on habitats and species. Don’t worry about the polar bears, which have survived hundreds of thousands of years of melting and freezing ice. Worry instead about the lions and tigers, which face extinction within our lifetime. Their problem isn’t climate change. It’s us.
That's right:

We live with "activists" who are clearly delusional, gullible, foolish, and - most importantly - are willing to commit fraud to make us pay for it. That is the problem - our legions of highly-motivated fools.

And it's not just environmentalists. It's every group that falls under what, over time, we've outlined as the NewAge (rhymes with "sewage") movement. These people have swarmed us with their many wrong-headed issues, are willing to do anything to get those issues legitimized, and will drag us all down to get there. Don't think failure is enough to stop them. They are the Borg. They will merely figure out another way to be wrong, but - whatever else they do - they. will. not. stop.

So what's the solution? NewAge leaders and icons should be humiliated and, where possible, jailed for fraud. That way, like followers of Mumia Abu-Jamal, NewAgers will have an issue they cannot win but will consume all their time and resources, leaving the rest of us free to get on with the other, legitimately important, things.

We think (since those in government and journalism have been found to be susceptible to such thinking) it's really the only way.

Plus - no matter how they phrase it - they have been stealing our money.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Lamer (Or A Secretary Of State Visits Psychics)

"Which party contains 99 percent of the people who believe (or believed):

-- O.J. is innocent;

-- Bush shirked his National Guard duty;

-- Sarah Palin's infant child, Trig, was actually the child of her daughter;

-- Justice Antonin Scalia threw the 2000 election to Bush so that his son could get a legal job with the Labor Department;

-- The spectacularly guilty Mumia Abu-Jamal was framed;

-- The Diebold Corp. secretly stole thousands of Kerry votes in 2004;

-- Duke lacrosse players gang-raped a stripper;

-- Bill Clinton did not have sex with "that woman";

-- Heterosexuals are just as likely to contract AIDS as gays;

-- John Edwards didn't have an affair with Rielle Hunter;

-- John Edwards' campaign aide Andrew Young is the father of Rielle Hunter's child.

And as has been recently noted, a 2007 Rasmussen poll showed that 35 percent of Democrats believe Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance, while 26 percent aren't sure ...

Another favorite MSNBC guest, Janeane Garofalo, believes Enron's Ken Lay faked his own death.

How many times has [Chris] Matthews forced Democratic officeholders to denounce Al Sharpton for the Tawana Brawley hoax? Or for that matter, how many times has he forced Sharpton -- a frequent guest on his show -- to admit the case was a fraud?

Sharpton has veto power over all Democratic presidential candidates. Even Al Gore, a former vice president of the United States, was required to kiss Sharpton's ring.

If there ever comes a time when Republican presidential candidates have to get the blessing of the head of the birther movement to run, I'll say: I'm wrong -- Republicans do have as many conspiracy nuts as the Democrats.

Not content with merely humoring their nuts, Democratic officeholders promote conspiracy theories themselves.

In 2003, Democratic presidential candidate and future Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean approvingly cited the left-wing lunacy that Saudi Arabia had warned Bush in advance about the 9/11 attacks. He promised a caller to National Public Radio that, if elected, he would investigate.

In the fall of 2004, Clinton's Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said she believed Bush was holding Osama bin Laden and planned to release him just before the election. (She later claimed she was joking -- a surprise to all three witnesses who heard her say it.)

Sen. Barbara Boxer officially objected to the certification of Ohio's votes in the 2004 election -- on the Senate floor -- and demanded an investigation into the 'Diebold stole Kerry votes' conspiracy theory.

And, of course, a Democratic House and Senate actually used official government proceedings to investigate the original nut-job conspiracy theory, the 'October Surprise,' maintaining that Reagan struck a secret deal with the Iranians not to release the hostages until after the 1980 election.

Rosie O'Donnell -- who has headlined many a Democratic fundraiser -- is a prominent 9/11 'truther.' She believes the World Trade Center was blown up with explosives, not taken down by terrorists in airplanes.

Most shockingly, the Democrats have a hand-in-glove relationship with Michael Moore, crackpot documentarian, whose 'Fahrenheit 9/11' is chock-a-block with demented conspiracy theories, including:

-- the 2000 election was stolen;

-- the Bush family clandestinely spirited the bin Laden family out of the U.S. after the 9/11 attacks; and

-- Bush went to war in Afghanistan, not to avenge the 9/11 terrorist attack, but to help the Unocal Corp. obtain a natural gas pipeline in Afghanistan.

Terry McAuliffe, then chairman of the Democratic National Committee attended the glittering Washington, D.C., premiere of 'Fahrenheit 9/11' and emerged endorsing Moore's wacko Unocal conspiracy theory. 'I believe it after seeing that,' McAuliffe said.

Show me RNC Chairman Michael Steele saying 'I believe the birthers' and I'll give 10 percent of my book profits to Air America, raising their profits to -- let's see ... about 10 percent of my book profits.

Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark proudly accepted Moore's endorsement in 2004, and Moore was an honored guest at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, sitting with former President Carter.

What is the likelihood that a birther will be sitting with former President Bush at the 2012 Republican National Convention?

Other Democrats who attended Moore's movie screening included Sens. Tom Daschle, Tom Harkin, Max Baucus, Ernest Hollings, Debbie Stabenow, Bill Nelson, and representatives Charles Rangel and Jim McDermott.

Show me a half-dozen Republican senators attending a birther movie premiere, and I'll pretend to believe that Olbermann went to the Ivy League Cornell."


-- Ann Coulter, mopping the floor - with those who live to lick it - on Ann Coulter.com.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Another White Man In Search Of His Black Roots

“Ayers' office door is decorated with pictures of Mumia Abu-Jamal, Che Guevara and Malcolm X. It is also home to pictures of children, bills of rights for students and parents, and a rainbow-hued greeting card advising 'How to Be Really Alive.'"
James Janega, exposing Bill Ayers as a race-obsessed, and potential NewAge, former-bomb-throwing communist (which would be a first for TMR to cover) while reporting for the Chicago Tribune.