Air Conditioning

O.K. - I've had enough - you people are idiots:

California can't afford Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's Green policies.

I told you San Francisco can't afford Mayor (and proven scumbag) Gavin Newsom's Green policies.

That bitch at the L.A. Times is, still, on the Green warpath against ordinary citizens.

And that staunch environmentalist, Prince Charles, is ignoring his environmental impact to go for a ride on his yacht.

While John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel, says Global Warming is a hoax - which is being carried out with with the help of the media (in case you haven't noticed) - and he's suing Al Gore.

Now, who are you stupid bastards gonna believe?

And where are all those overflowing landfills?

Repeating History (Just To Lose Again)

"L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the Church of Scientology is quoted as saying:

“Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous. If a man really wanted to make a million dollars, the best way to do it would be start his own religion.”

Not to compare religious ideologies or beliefs, but those seem like unlikely foundations for any of the other major religions in the world. It is also important to note, that no religion is without its failures, faults, murders, missteps and sordid history. My analysis is Scientology isn’t a religion, and the mere fact that its founder based his ideology on the foundation of making money as its sole purpose for existing just goes to prove the point, money is the root of all evil. And tacking the term religion onto a derived set of self-help techniques cobble together by a man who was previously known for writing mediocre science fiction, is dubious to say the least.

Hubbard, through his own greed and self-consuming need for power, took his mediocre science fiction writing skills and pieced together contemporary (but questionable) psychology beliefs, his own form of sci-fi terminology, mysticism, infused some unethical psyop methods of intimidation and created a futuristic-sounding philosophy, which at its core has more in common with Nazi fascism than any acceptable present-day religious beliefs."

- From Church of Scientology - Power, Lies, Corruption, Part III - Hyprocrisy and Double Standards on Glosslip.com

The funniest thing (if you can call it that) about about the re-emergence of fascism is how few recognize it for what is. How these attractively-dressed, environmental, pseudo-spiritual, and health-based (but definitely political) ideologies are emerging - in exactly the same way as at the start of the 20th Century - and shaping certain individual lives, causing the rest of us (especially those prone to reading) to break apart and choose sides against them.

Too many, like Seil at The L.A. Times, (and women are more guilty of this, today, than I ever imagined) seriously think that pushing their beliefs on other people - by force - is the right thing to do. "We've got the numbers!" is all they need to believe to get them going. Right and wrong - and, especially, facts or consequences - are an afterthought. If they're contemplated at all.

I can't tell you how many people I've recently heard scream "I don't care!" when faced with facts they don't like. (They might as well add "...about the Jews!" to that statement to get it.) And they mean it: They are demanding their wrong information, and the wrong behavior that follows it ("Garbage in, garbage out"), is not only acceptable but something an "asshole" like me (i.e. someone who reads, thinks, and sticks up for himself) will just have to live with. Like I will just roll over and play dead because that's what they think I should do. They think (or don't) it worked for Hitler, right? Sure it did.

What's the old saying?

"Those that don't study history,..."

Stop Recycling NOW

Earlier this month I did a post called "Recycling Is Wrong, Wrong, Wrong" because this dangerously silly woman in my hometown named "Siel" (above, blogging for The L.A. Times) was trying to goad the authorities into punishing anyone who wouldn't go along with that long-standing, but ridiculously harmful, garbage collecting scheme. My post featured a link to a highly-informative New York Times story, "Recycling Is Garbage", which outlined the history of recycling, and the many reasons that it is "the most wasteful activity in modern America: a waste of time and money, a waste of human and natural resources."

So I sent Siel a link to my post and she wrote back:

"Feel free to email me when you put up a post with reasons why you think recycling's wrong, in conjunctions with other people's links. I like to read, you know, actual content."

In other words, this snarky madwoman refused to even click on the New York Times article that proved she was wrong and acting like a Nazi - out to punish anyone who doesn't agree with her wrong-headed obsession - because I didn't personally write it. In other words, this so-called "smart" person willingly put her fingers in her ears and sang, "La-la-la-la-la", to ignore important facts she didn't like - as she's actively trying to bring the power of the State of California down upon innocent people's heads. Like I said, a fucking Nazi.

Now, today, The San Francisco Chronicle's C.W. Nevius (above) wrote an article about a nuisance recycling plant in my old Bay Area neighborhood, the Haight/Ashbury. This time I sent him the New York Times article, and this was the reaction:

"Huh. That's interesting. Thanks. CWN"

That's all he said: "That's interesting." Remember, we're talking about "the most wasteful activity in modern America" - billions of dollars of our tax money gone and nothing for helping "the planet" - and he merely finds the information "interesting".

But will he report on the "interesting" news that (in a misguided effort to "Save The Planet") we're actually doing the wrong thing to the earth and ourselves - and on a massive scale? I seriously doubt it.

Sure, these (so-called) "journalists" will go on and on about the worthless banning of plastic bags, and all the other counter-productive nonsense that's being proposed to nanny state us into a Third World country. But, for some reason, they refuse to write anything that admits the direction we're all being aggressively pushed into - the direction they themselves are pushing us toward - is factually just plain wrong. Why?

Well, as anyone who regularly reads this blog knows, I say it's because they're environmental cultists. Now, I know, many of you may not agree with the term but what do you call people, whose jobs it is to inform us of the wasteful uses of government and money, who refuse to do just that because it it makes them personally feel good to act like assholes while believing in this wrong-headed cause of blindly following Al Gore? I can't find another name for them. "Cultists" fits too well.

And, I swear, from where I sit, after all the betrayals these fascist NewAge idiots are putting society through, the WWII idea of one day shaving their heads, and marching them through the streets as examples to us all, is starting to look better and better,...