Jesus, I've been mentally insulted before I've even had my breakfast:
Ed Driscoll has noted that Ann Althouse said "Drudge does commentary. You just have to figure out what he's trying to say with his juxtapositions — Drudgtapositions."
To which I reply, really? Why, "professor"? Why do we "have to" parse his bullshit? Is wasting our time, allowing some guy in a fedora to get us all pumped up, over what 3/4 of his stories add up to - nothing - really in our interest? How?
TMR readers should ask themselves - since Ann or Ed can't seem to challenge their own bullshit - do you actually learn anything from Drudge's links, or are you merely titillated by them? If you're honest, and find it's the latter, then just admit reading all three of these assholes (plus Glenn Reynolds of course) is nothing more than a distraction from actual political engagement and, thus, no more edifying to the body politic than visiting a quarter porn palace.
Or are you going to prove me wrong by reminding me how these "friends" of yours guided conservatives - and President Romney - to that "easy" victory last November?
Yeah - that's what I thought. The proof is in the pudding:
All these useless professors coaches are "teaching" you is how to flub a lay-up,...
Hmmm, perhaps I have been taking the Drudge Report wrong.
ReplyDeletePerhaps, if I laid a ruler up and aligned the items on his page (the Drudgetapositions as Ms. Althouse has so kindly clued me in to the secret of the conservative gnostics) I may find the secret code and learn the wisdom contained therein.
Perhaps it will say something useful, like "be sure to drink your Ovaltine".
I suppose it's worth a try!
PW