I've never heard of Karl Kraus, but he sounds, as the saying goes, like "a kindred spirit":
He wasn't in the business of denigrating the masses or lowbrow culture; the calculated difficulty of his writing wasn't a barricade against the barbarians. It was aimed, instead, at bright and well-educated cultural authorities who embraced a phony kind of individuality – people Kraus believed ought to have known better.
You can guess who all they'd be, today, I'm sure.
The political results - with blacks and the poor clamoring to join their cause - speak for themselves.
And, if not, here's a "ought to have known better" hint.
ADDED:
Can you imagine what things would look like, if Putin had written his Op-Ed, but started referencing the "teachings" of Joseph Smith?
We'd be far beyond just "embarrassed" on the world stage,...
ADDED:
Can you imagine what things would look like, if Putin had written his Op-Ed, but started referencing the "teachings" of Joseph Smith?
We'd be far beyond just "embarrassed" on the world stage,...
Don't blame me - at least I voted against Obama.
ReplyDelete" he sounds, as the saying goes, like "a kindred spirit"
ReplyDeleteYou could have fit right in with his "cult-like followers".
Yeah, that's me,...
ReplyDeleteFranzen: "I read the Globe with an especially cold Krausian eye, and it obligingly enraged me with its triviality and its shoddy proofreading and its dopily punning weather headlines."
ReplyDeleteI chuckled at that line, considering the second paragraph of Franzen's essay starts off with a typo.
I read Krauss with a Fortean eye.
ReplyDelete