Embarrassment Is The Only Thing Whites Understand (And Some Have Been Determined To Give It To Them)

“Sherman’s aggressiveness, ....‘demoralized Confederates, hastening the end of slavery and the reunification of the nation.’”

“Katzenbach reveals, with some glee, how he was told by Bobby Kennedy that JFK wanted him to make Wallace look silly,….”

Make Money From Feminism & Gay Pride Hosting Those Who Scream "Race Hustler" And Attacking A Black Guy

 

"Most of the people who graduated in the 60's, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, and educational systems. You are stuck with them. You can't get through to them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You can not change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior."  

"The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already for the last 25 years,...Most of it is done by Americans to Americans thanks to lack of moral standards,...exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization."

"People with greater math and numerical reasoning skills actually skewed their results more than those with lesser abilities depending on what they felt the fake study was assessing. Being smarter about something made it more likely that you would allow your political beliefs to harm your objective reasoning skills." 

 

"None of this is good — because it means that objective sets of facts, science and evidence are becoming increasingly less relevant in today's society, while the 'tribes' you belong to and their leaders may be vastly more important to what you think and how you act."

 

"Where it can become dangerous is when the leaders that you trust for road maps simply lie or deceive for their own purposes, because more and more, this research implies, there is a tendency to simply ignore an objective set of facts if it goes against your beliefs and what people you trust are telling you." 

 

This sort of 'cultural cognition' model has profound implications for all sorts of things. In the Syrian situation, for instance, it may not matter whether Syria used chemical weapons against its own people. What may matter more to you is whether you believe Barack Obama when he presents that objective set of facts. Facts don't matter. Who describes them to you does."

The Crack Emcee: 

"All [Ann Althouse] has to do, for me, is show the balls I used to give her credit for and openly and honestly engage her critics. Say sorry sometimes. I made a mistake. Whatever. It ain't asking for much."

Meade Lawrence ["Second" husband to Ann Althouse]: 

"What makes you the high judge of who is sufficiently open and honest and who is not?"

"Artist" Carries A Lot Of Cache' Too (And I Carry It Well)

 

 Somebody better send this to Roger Simon, because he and his crew don't read what I write.

But I write it first:

“For as much time as we spend understanding our presidents’ policies and politics, relatively little effort is spent trying to understand them as people. We mythologize them as candidates and demonize them as presidents, denying our leaders the balm that soothes mere mortals: benefit of the doubt.”

They've lost their humanity, that's what I see. It's not just the Democrats, but my "side", too. I'm a staunch Republican - the guy this party was started for - and, I'm telling you, they've lost the plot.

And they won't get it - because they're rewarded for not getting it. 

All this talk of the need for minorities. Well, I've been here, what are they doing? Nothing to bring me closer. I'm stepping away from them. Fuck the talk, that's the evidence. We're primed to take our next big leap but they expect us to flirt with them for not doing it:

"The Althouse Amazon portal: 14" long 4" wide 2" thick."

(How gay. When is it going to dawn on them the title "professor" carries weight?)

   

Sure, Meade - you two also said Mitt Romney was a great choice for president.

Make yourself useful, and the next time you're using Ann's "portal," stock up on KY jelly,...

 

It Seems It's "Just Us" Now: No Justice Mo' Piss

Well, it seems that whoever was offended by the blog has had the proper effect - visits have fallen through the floor - but that's cool, because now it's me and the rest of the hardcore, and I finally have a good idea of how many of you that is. The level of donations have been quite gratifying, too, making me feel special while somebody's trying to make me feel small.

BTW - I've got an idea about who that somebody is. There's been a jerk from Daly City, California (it's always California) who's been recently taunting me with homosexual comments, until I started deleting them, so I guess he went the politically correct route and got Blogger to do his bidding. (Isn't it weird, in America, how easily that works nowadays? Blogger didn't even ask me what's going on,...) But, as I said when the WARNING went up, he's done me as much of a favor as hurt me, because the rest of you responded with donations (Big Thumbs Up to the Ladies!) and, seriously, if this was one of those blogs done exclusively for fame you'd see me acting like other bloggers, and posting everywhere to promote it, and I just don't do that. TMR will live or die under it's own power - it's been sabotaged by NewAge libs three times now - but, if there's one thing the attacks it receives proves, it does have power:

We - me, what I've created here, and the people who regularly read and participate in it - can and will not be ignored.

I'm sorry about not posting yesterday, but I've got a friend who needed some help doing some back-breaking work, and when I got home all I wanted was a beer, some food, and some sleep. It's a trip to not to be watching things for a day, because now I feel kind of like events have gotten away from me a little, when I'm so used to staying on top of them, even if I'm not commenting on every little thing that happens. That said, I've decided to make a few changes from here on out, picking up the pace, starting with a reduction in the number of photos I use (Most of my time is spent reading, grabbing photos and videos, and trying to organize them into something). This way, I think, I'll be able to post more often and maybe become an even bigger part of the dialogue. To the artists and weirdoes I say, don't fret, I'm still going to have them, but there will also be posts that don't from now on, just so we can talk about more. I'm also hoping it'll inspire more comments, though I know, talking to me scares some people. (Man up, folks, they're only words,...)

Alright - before I start cussing everybody out again - I want you to know "I Love You", and it's nothing personal, but like a father to his kids, I want everyone to do better and this is just the time-tested approach that really gets results.

Just ask whoever the pussy was who got "insulted".

O.K., shape up or ship out, assholes! I'ma jump in the shower and then hit it - hard - including that promised piece on cultism.

CMC

Ladies & Gentlemen: Here's Bedlam & Mayhem!

The Internet Is A Dangerous Place For Children

Hat Tip: iOwnTheWorld

The Clown Show

After my Mary Katharine Ham post, Ann Althouse asked her readers to judge who was a better representative for conservatism - Mary Katharine Ham or I.

I lost in a landslide.

That didn't surprise me, because I'm known for breaking taboos - and breaking balls - and Mary Katharine Ham is known for being,...Mary Katharine Ham.

When I asked the others to defend their reasoning, the answers I got were revealing - and, in the case of the men, more than a little sad.

They all admitted Mary Katharine Ham doesn't bring anything new to the table.

But Mary Katharine Ham, you see, along with being a woman, is "FUNNY" and a "happy warrior".

That was enough to make me think conservatism has been infantilized.

Content doesn't matter.

Whether what you're saying is original, important, or correct, doesn't either.

Whether it rolls over liberalism, who cares?

Being seen as a cart wheeling clown is what matters.

I don't really think Althouse's readers considered how their words struck me.

Are they not aware the writer, Kay Hymowitz is currently marketing a book called Manning Up specifically about how men today won't grow up?

Are they suggesting I join that demoralizing phenomena in order to be acceptable?

And why must I - or anyone else - be anymore "happy" than I choose to be?

Especially when discussing serious topics?

Is conservatism an ideological movement or a popularity contest?

In Pascal Bruckner's new essay, Condemned To Joy, the French writer and philosopher has this to say about the parameters of contemporary American culture:

The Western cult of happiness is indeed a strange adventure, something like a collective intoxication. In the guise of emancipation, it transforms a high ideal into its opposite. Condemned to joy, we must be happy or lose all standing in society. It is not a question of knowing whether we are more or less happy than our ancestors; our conception of the thing itself has changed, and we are probably the first society in history to make people unhappy for not being happy.

That ability to twist a good idea into something horrible is, of course, a defining component of my favorite subject - the NewAge.

The NewAge introduced me to the killers who speak of "peace", the "healers" who use water as medicine, the messengers with "The Secret" who perpetuate a fraud on all who listen, and the icons of morality caught being immoral at every turn.

No one who comments at Althouse would describe themselves as a NewAger.

That, too, is a facet of New Age.

No, what they'll keep doing is demanding - as society demands - we all conform to NewAge's tenets, while denying they exist at all.

And, if they do, it's someone else who's involved in it.


But not them, or Mary Katharine Ham, or any of the other grinning fools who perpetuate the same "conservative" nonsense over and over again, claiming it's new or expecting a different result.

This, like following the Maharishi's dogmatic dictates, will somehow lead to our freedom.

And make them "happy".

Personally, like the larger NewAge culture, I think they're badly mistaken about the concept of happiness.

But I have nothing against any of them for thinking this.

I don't even have anything against Mary Katharine Ham.

I just don't think any of them truly understand what NewAge has done to us.