Showing posts with label oscars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oscars. Show all posts

Saturday, March 16, 2024

The Band "Front 242" Had More Influence Than The Resolution It's Named After


   


Sunday, March 16, 2014

Slavery Was About Millions Of People & They're PISSED


It's hilarious, that a lot of white people wouldn't go to see 12 Years a Slave because it was too brutal, when most film lovers were rooting for something much more extreme:






My girl, Eileen Jones, is simply torn up about it:

  The first is the opening scene, when Django, a member of a chain gang of manacled slaves shuffling through the harsh cold terrain of Texas in winter, is liberated by Dr. Schultz, who shoots the slavers. Dr. Schultz then counsels the other slaves about how to negotiate their own way to freedom, and Christoph Waltz’s singsong voice is light and frolicsome throughout. Django never speaks to them, seems too shocked by rapid developments. This seems like the film’s starting point on slavery: there is no cooperation among slaves, there’s hardly even sympathy or communication amongst slaves, and therefore, no possibility of united action. We know that’s not true as a rule, historically. But as a genre film set-up it might work well if, for instance, you intended to rectify that terrible state of affairs with gradually increasing sympathy, communication, and cooperation, all leading up to a goddamn SLAVE REVOLT.


So there you have it - if you can't handle 12 Years - prepare yourselves, white folks:

The drums are now beating for the real thing,…
 

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Acting? Who Said Anything About Acting? Fuck Acting

 

Whew Boy. The Dallas Buyer's ClubSlate's talking Matthew McConaughey Oscar bait, while Slant knows - having been here before - that can only mean one thing:
"One could argue that the AMA and Big Pharma, with their endless pockets and insurmountable lobbying power, have fought their battle against natural medicine, chiropractors, and any other voices of marginal dissent so unfairly for so long that the most effective response is necessarily one-sided. But if you're appealing to the reason of the consumer, and if you intend to respect the intelligence of your audience, sacrificing intelligent debate for the sake of impassioned delivery reduces the intellectual substance of your arguments drastically."

Discuss amongst yourselves - Slate even admits the lie:
"In reality, though the FDA did warn AIDS patients about one of Woodroof’s drugs in particular, they seem to have largely taken a 'look the other way' approach with Woodroof and his club."

Like Milk - which really should've mentioned Jim Jones and The People's Temple - for some reason, somebody's trying to feed us a line, here, again. Why do they keep doing that?



I don't know who all is in on it, or probably what's-what, even - no name on it like "Lee Daniels' 'The Butler'" - all I know, for sure, is this much: 



Slant opens with "new-age-y" and that's good enough for me,...

Friday, January 23, 2009

Everybody Knows Gay Politics Make Good Films

"I can,...foresee a furious groundswell led by anti-Proposition 8 activists on behalf of 'Milk,' a film whose politics seem to extend quite a bit further than what it actually shows on screen."
-- Andrew Gumbel, noticing the political phoniness of the Oscars, in The Los Angeles Times.