Showing posts with label tibet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tibet. Show all posts

Sunday, September 16, 2018

Hello, Dalai - News Flash: He's Not Reincarnated And Tibet's Now Going To China


Of course, just like The Pope, he said nothing to anyone and let the kids suffer:
You can still worship him, if you want, but - if his position wasn't much help when it comes to reporting child abuse - I doubt it'll work, in any other context, either.

Monday, June 17, 2013

Thursday, March 31, 2011

A Question For The Many Followers Of The Dalai Lama: When He Finally Steps Down From Power Will You Ever Finally Stand Up For Yourselves?

"Buddha" is the number one search term for TMR and, considering the number of people who think Buddhism and all that flows from it is cool, I (and a few others) don't see how most supposedly-educated people in the 21st Century can hold their heads up in public:
Every Western liberal’s favourite man-god has finally announced that he will relinquish political authority and allow his people to choose their own leader. Yes, the Dalai Lama, doyen of the West’s metropolitan chattering classes and hero of every suntanned seeker of spiritual enlightenment, has decided that 52 years is rather long enough to have claimed to speak on behalf of the Tibetan people (10 years longer than Colonel Gaddafi has been making similar BS claims in relation to Libya) and that the time has come for a leader “elected freely by the Tibetan people”. One question springs to mind: what took him so long?

I have never understood the Western hippyish love-in with this giggling monk from the East, where everyone from Hollywood royalty (Richard Gere, Sharon Stone) to literal royalty (Prince Charles) treats him as some kind of unfathomable well of godlike insight. After all, this is a bloke who claims to foreswear worldly goods yet who once guest-edited French Vogue, a mag packed with photos of half-naked women holding handbags that cost more than my house. He’s also done an advert for Apple, which I suppose is marginally better than doing one for BP, and he frequently turns up at glitzy celeb balls held in his honour, including one at which Sharon Stone introduced him as “Mr Please, Please, Please Let Me Back Into China!”, silly bint that she is.

Also, the Dalai Lama has the sorts of views on women and ethnic minorities which if they were uttered at an Islington dinner party would lead to half the guests instantly text-messaging Trevor Phillips to complain. One expert describes Tibetan Buddhist theocracy as “relentlessly misogynistic”. The Dalai Lama says gay sex is “unnatural”. In 1993 in Seattle (where else?) he told a fawning audience of students and part-time Buddhists that “nature arranged male and female organs in such a manner that is very suitable… same-sex organs cannot manage well.” Someone needs to send his Holiness a gay-sex manual. It is striking that some of the very same latte-sippers who get hot under the collar about the Pope’s hang-ups over homos and women also decorate their homes with the paraphernalia of a religious figure who believes the exact same stuff.
[Photo of the Dalai Lama with his "friend", the Nazi Heinrich Harrer.]

I guess I'll just have to accept that most people's beliefs are so superficial and pathetic, I'll never be able to expect anything more than blind cultists, searching for invisible "energy", by following a bunch of nobodies claiming to deliver magic that never appears.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Buddhism's A Belief Right Out Of Sesame Street

How a supposedly atheist country can continue to play this game is beyond us:
It’s probably best not to even try making sense of Beijing’s pronouncements on the 14th Dalai Lama and other Tibetan spiritual leaders: you’ll only make your head hurt. Last week the officially atheist Chinese government’s State Administration for Religious Affairs disclosed plans to enact a new law forbidding the 75-year-old Buddhist deity to be reborn anywhere but on Chinese-controlled soil, and giving final say to Chinese authorities when the time comes to identify his 15th incarnation.

That might seem to pose a dilemma, given the exiled leader’s earlier promise that he will never again be reincarnated in Tibet as long as his homeland remains under China’s heel. Still, no one seems too concerned just now about the Dalai Lama’s next life.
Considering no one in the history of mankind has ever been proven to have reincarnated, that last line is the only thing in the entire article resembling a connection to reality. Here's a fun fact about why the Dalai Lama's staying in India, though:
The Chinese say he’s merely on a quest to retrieve a black hat said to have magical powers,...
A magic hat? Suurrre. We think he's also traveling with an imaginary friend. Whatever.

There's some other nonsense in there about him somehow magically acquiring $1.6 million dollars, but who cares about that? The man's reincarnated and looking for a magic hat!

Look, call us whenever those guys in the orange robes decide to grow up, o.k.?

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Crap: I Am Young Enough To Know Everything

Sp!ked's Brendan O'Neill just got back back from Tibet and discovered something no Buddhist, here in the West, will tell you:

"I know I’m not supposed to say this, but Tibetan Buddhism really freaked me out.

The most striking thing is how different real Tibetan Buddhism is from the re-branded, part-time version imported over here by the Dalai Lama’s army of celebrities.

Listening to Richard Gere, the first incarnation of the Hollywood Lama, you could be forgiven for thinking that Tibetan Buddhism involves sitting in the lotus position for 20 hours a day and thinking Bambi-style thoughts. Tibetan Buddhism has a 'resonance and a sense of mystery,' says Gere, through which you can find 'beingness' (whatever that means).

Watching Jennifer Aniston’s character Rachel read a collection of the Dalai Lama’s teachings in Central Perk on
Friends a few years ago, you might also think that Tibetan Buddhism is something you can ingest while sipping on a skinny-milk, no-cream, hazelnut latte.

Or consider the answer given by one of Frank J. Korom’s students at Boston University when he asked her why she was wearing a Tibetan Buddhist necklace. 'It keeps me healthy and happy,' she said, reducing Tibetan Buddhism, as so many Dalai Lama-loving undergrads do, to the religious equivalent of knocking back a vitamin pill.

The reality couldn’t be more different."
How different? Well, aside from the "garish statues of dancing demons, fat golden Buddhas surrounded by wads of cash, walls and ceilings painted in super-lavish colours, and such a stench of incense that it’s like being in a hippy student’s dorm room", he says:

"The first devout Buddhists I encountered looked neither healthy nor happy. They were walking from their villages in southern Tibet to Jokhang Temple in Lhasa, Tibetan Buddhism’s holiest site, and the journey had taken them nearly three months. Which isn’t surprising considering that with every third or fourth step they took, they got down on their knees and then fully prostrated themselves on the ground, lying flat on their bellies and burying their faces in the dirt, before getting back up, taking a few more steps, and doing the painful prostration thing again.

It looked life-zappingly exhausting. They moved at a snail’s pace. Their foreheads were stained grey from such frequent, unforgiving contact with the bruising earth. They wore wooden planks on their hands, which made a deathly clatter every time they hurled themselves downwards."
Now that sounds like a truly "green" lifestyle to me! And one O'Neill says he'd "like to see Jennifer Aniston try", as would I, since she's so keen on getting the rest of us into it. I'd also like to see the inside of her home because, I'm sure, it's probably not "spiritual" enough yet:

"Packed with weird statues. Red demons with contorted faces. Smug-looking Buddhas smiling patronizingly at the poor, exhausted worshippers. There’s a statue of the 'Living Buddha' (now deceased) who administered this temple in the 1950s and 60s and it is wearing sunglasses. Terrifyingly, it looks like a cross between the Buddha and Bono."
Are you starting to get the impression these holier-than-thou celebrities are either deceiving themselves, or "trying to pull a fast one" on you, yet? And what about all that Western worshipping of the Dalai Lama? Surely in Tibet, of all places, they must be down with that, too, right?

"Tibetan Buddhism, like every other religion on Earth, is made up of various, sometimes horn-locking sects.

I excitedly lined up an interview with one of the monks and asked if he’s looking forward to the day when the Dalai Lama returns from exile in northern India. He patiently told me—dumb Westerner that I am—that he doesn’t worship the Dalai Lama, because he is a member of the Nyingma school of Tibetan Buddhism while the Dalai Lama is head of the Gelug school. Then there’s the Kagyu school and the Sakya school—making four in total—which have hot-headed disagreements and have even come to blows in recent years over which deities should be worshipped and which should not. Religion of peace? Yeah, right."
Hmmm. This isn't going too well. So maybe Jennifer wants the rest of Americans to go the Eastern route because Buddhism isn't like those close-minded religions in the West? You know, receiving all that "enlightenment" one gets when you're "spiritual but not religious"? That has to be it.

"Tibetan Buddhism has a whole lotta hang-ups about gays and girls, too. It says gay sex is 'unnatural.' The Dalai Lama declared in a talk in Seattle in 1993, during one of his whistle stop, U2-style world tours, that 'nature arranged male and female organs in such a manner that is very suitable… same-sex organs cannot manage well.' (Someone needs to explain to His Holiness how gay people get it on.)"
Funny, but I've never heard Richard Gere mention that when he was putting on a show, bowing and scraping at the Dalai Lama's feet in San Francisco. Surely, it was only a mere oversight - or maybe he's got it all wrong - or somebody's lying:

"As Bernard Faure of Columbia University says: 'Like most clerical discourses, Buddhism is… relentlessly misogynist.' So while Tibetan women can become nuns, they can’t advance nearly as far as men. Because according to Buddhist teachings it is impossible for women to become 'the perfectly rightfully Enlightened One,' 'the Universal Monarch,' 'the King of Gods,' 'the King of Death,' or 'Brahmaa'—the five highest, holiest positions in Buddhism."
Wow. That sounds a lot like the evil Catholic church, there. So much so, that even O'Neill notices something is amiss:

"It is striking how much the backward elements of Tibetan Buddhism are forgiven or glossed over by its hippyish, celebrity, and middle-class followers over here,...the way in which this religion has come to be viewed in Western New Age circles as a peaceful, pure, happy-clappy cult of softly-smiling, Buddha-like beings. Again, it’s no such thing."
Well, I'm glad to see he got the "c" word in there, but "backward"? Buddhist nonsense is supposed to be far, far superior to the nonsense being delivered on this side of the planet, isn't it? I've been told that for years - some Buddhists have practically threatened my life to make the point of how great it is - and now you're telling me it's just the NewAge nonsense I've been railing against all along?

"Frank J. Korom describes it as 'New Age orientalism,' where Westerners in search of some cheap and easy purpose in their empty lives 'appropriate Tibet and portions of its religious culture for their own purposes.' They treat a very old, complex religion as a kind of buffet of ideas that they can pick morsels from, jettisoning the stranger, more demanding stuff—like the dancing demons and the prostration workout—but picking up the shiny things, like the sacred necklaces and bracelets and the BS about reincarnation.

It is all about them. They have bent and warped a religion to suit their own needs. As the Tibetan lama Dagyab Kyabgon Rinpoche puts it, 'The concept of "Tibet" becomes a symbol for all those qualities that Westerners feel lacking: joie de vivre, harmony, warmth and spirituality… Tibet thus becomes a utopia, and Tibetans become noble savages.'"
In other words, it's just more racist NewAge crap, dressed up to make white Westerners feel good about themselves - again:

"Western losers have ransacked Tibetan Buddhism in search of the holy grail of self-meaning."
"Western losers" - just as I've always said. A bunch of empty, purposeless fools in search of a way to attract attention from the rest of us, and away from themselves, because if they don't have *something* - anything - to distract them, the idea they're absolutely worthless human beings will become way too obvious and overwhelming. Even if they have money. Especially if they have money.

Or did you think "Friends" was great art?

It's no wonder Jennifer Anniston can't keep a man.

Or that - by a long shot - Western Buddhists/NewAgers make being an atheist (of knowing yourself and the world around you for what it truly is) look better and better every day.

Oh - and before I forget - if any of this information is new to you, you might want to also check out my post, "Goose-Stepping To God":

There's more to this "Dalai Lama" person - and his fans - than meets the eye,...

Friday, February 19, 2010

Garbage In/Garbage Out - Right By The Garbage

"Exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama (L) walks out the doors of the Palm Room of the White House by trash bags waiting to be picked up due to delays from the snow storms of last week in Washington, DC, February 18, 2010 after meeting with US President Barack Obama."
-- AFP

UPDATE: Joaquin says in the comments:

"Why not give him some laundry to drop-off at the cleaners while he's at it!"

Fucking hilarious.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

On The Never-Ending Search,...For Spirituality

"When [Ireland's] President Mary McAleese visited Dzogchen Beara, a spectacular Buddhist retreat perched high above the Atlantic Ocean on the rugged west Cork peninsula in September 2007, she was full of praise for Sogyal Rinpoche, its Tibetan-born spiritual director.

It was, the president said, 'a particular joy' to be in the company of a lama and bestselling author whose “wonderful work” is 'known to many people right around the world'.

The president’s remarks about the spiritual leader, whose name means Precious One, along with photographs of her visit now feature prominently on the centre’s website, which advertises courses on bereavement and meditation.

Last April the president’s office also sent 'warmest good wishes' to a conference on spiritual care hosted in Killarney by Rigpa, an international Buddhist organisation that Rinpoche leads.

It has now emerged that Rinpoche has a controversial past and was once accused in a $10m (€7.16m) American lawsuit of 'physical, mental and sexual abuse'."


-- Richard Oakley, with news that's now so easy to predict it defies the word "predictable", in The Times Online.

When, Oh when will you people learn? Or even start learning? You've got the "lusting" part down, but the learning,...

Monday, May 26, 2008

It's Official: Earthquakes Are NOT Political



Actress Sharon Stone has stuck her foot in her mouth by making some very Louise Hay-type statements, saying the recent natural disasters in China were "karma" for that nation's treatment of Tibet.

Of course Sharon Stone is the wife of San Francisco Chronicle Exec. Vice President and Editor, Phil Brounstein, which is another form of the NewAge phenomena.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Winner: Best Picture

"Anyone who criticises the Dalai Lama is written off as a Chinese puppet. It’s just another way of shutting down debate. People in the West look upon Tibet as this ideal place, but Tibetans find it hard to have serious debates or to stand up to the Dalai Lama. It’s almost medieval."

-- Kelsang Pema, a Buddhist nun, in a Brendan O'Neill column for Spiked!

Thursday, April 3, 2008

It's All About The Finger

"[Berkeley's] recent dustup with the U.S. Marine Corps has so far cost the city more than $200,000, while businesses say they've been slammed by related protests.

And that's on top of the $1 million the city spends annually on domestic and foreign policy matters hatched by its 45 citizen commissions, which outnumber those in virtually every other city in America and debate everything from regime change in Iran to the plight of nonneutered dogs."


- From Carolyn Jones, pointing the finger at Berkeley, in the San Francisco Chronicle

"Nothing brings out the political grandstanding like the national - or even better, the international - spotlight. And so it is that as the Olympic torch is headed for the city, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors has forthrightly gone on record against human rights violations in China.

And the point is?

Not that anyone is in favor of human rights violations. And China certainly has a miserable record.

But who asked the supes? Falun Gong has been handing out leaflets and flyers in front of City Hall in protest of the torch for weeks. "Team Tibet" has an active and vocal group of supporters and is coordinating protests. Archbishop Desmond Tutu is coming to town along with actor Richard Gere.

Was the thinking that there wasn't going to be enough publicity? Because, right now, this looks suspiciously like a group of local pols running to the front of a parade.

This week, Supervisor Chris Daly went to a lot of work getting a resolution passed that condemns human rights violations in China. He introduced it first in the City Operations and Neighborhood Services Committee, where it was turned to mush with amendments by Supervisor Carmen Chu. He then reintroduced it in the Rules Committee, of which he is chairman, and got it to the board that way.

That it passed Tuesday at the full board meeting 8-3 seems to indicate that this wasn't exactly a ticking time bomb of controversy. After all, who doesn't want to vote against human rights violations?

The larger question is: Who should? Even Daly admitted afterward to the Fog City Journal blog - he is a public official who only speaks to media members he considers friendly - that the issue was 'a bit out of reach of the San Francisco supervisors.'"


-- San Francisco Chronicle columnist, C.W. Nevius, pointing that finger right back at San Francisco.