Whatever it is y'all is, you got us all wrong,...
"The head of a publicly funded anti-violence group is now facing charges after allegedly attacking his wife inside their suburban home."
"The Obama administration and most of those working for it have taken Islamic terrorism about as seriously as I am taking the Memphis Grizzlies/L.A. Clippers game currently on my TV — in other words, at best mildly interested. Not being a fan of either team, I could watch — I could switch to something else."
"Tamerlan, evidently , left quite a trail, from domestic violence to reportedly attacking an imam for holding up MLK as someone to emulate. Not exactly subtle. They were even warned about Tamerlan by the Russians apparently.
The Feds must have been pretty clueless to ignore all this."
I'm getting to the point where I like trouble, disasters, things going wrong. Because, apparently, something horrible happening seems to be the only way that people start to focus on standing up for the right thing.
Look at Haiti. Did the world really care about Haiti before the earthquake? I mean really, really care? Naw. They knew about Haiti's problems. They knew all about how the French screwed them over as slaves and then the French wrongly threw them into debt - when all the Haitians wanted was their freedom from the French - but come on, what were "sophisticated" people saying before the earthquake?
O.J. Simpson was a big star before the murders. Sure, the cops were always going out to his mansion because he beat the crap out of his wife on a regular basis. But he'd autograph a tiny football for them, tell them a story about the latest other stunning blonde he slept with last night (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) and then nobody cared about Nicole Brown Simpson over there crying in the corner - especially not the public.
That's modern touchy-feely NewAge "society" for you.
So tragedy is starting to strike me as useful. I can now open the paper (or, actually, my laptop) and look forward to reading about shootings, financial collapses, dishonest politicians, quacks, and assorted "spiritual" types with a smile, knowing the actions of such human waste are the only way the rest of you will ever learn anything.
I was marveling today at this quote from Glenn Reynolds, on the journalists in the White House press pool:"They expected to be lied to. They just expected the lies to be . . . better."Just think about that statement for a second. Professor Reynolds expected there would be lying. The journalists elected "the Messiah" & Co. to lie to them. (It's the quality of his lies that offends them now.) There isn't even the implication that there should be a shred of truth that exists in our public lives. And as long as all these good Christians can hide behind that old trope about everybody being a sinner, well, you're not going to get much cooperation regarding anyone's private life either.
So why's everyone on John Edwards' case again?
So yea, I think it's about time for the assassin's bullet, the mad bomber, the crazed gunman, or the terrorist-on-a-rampage to make his regularly scheduled appointment. Take out somebody important - or a bunch of nobodies - just to get this solipsistic generation's attention long enough that their maniacal Merry-Go-Round can finally halt for a little while, before everyone promptly forgets (or, more likely, glosses over) what just happened, and decides,...you know what? they really liked that insane music playing after all,...so crank that puppy back up as soon as possible - and LOUD.
Because that's the signal it's y'all's turn to start smiling again, and you don't have to worry because everything's going back to just the way you like it,...

"Law students will now be treated to another round of Elvis sightings parading as scholarship."-- Christina Hoff Sommers, kicking another feminist in the ass - this time, it's "Nancy K.D. Lemon, a lecturer in domestic-violence law at the University of California at Berkeley's School of Law, for publishing errors in the popular textbook she edits, Domestic Violence Law" - because that's what Christina Hoff Sommers does, for The Chronicle Of Higher Education.
"You want the young American
Needless to say - since my divorce, immersion in NewAge feminist thought (I'm currently reading a very-confused, sneering, book, The Bitch in the House: 26 Women Tell The Truth About Sex, Solitude, Work, Motherhood, and Marriage) along with an equally-careful reading of the song lyrics I hear most often - this "Young American" has grown extremely skeptical of such stories.
Who knows what a woman will do, to drive a man to treat her as one man would another, when they act like unforgiving assholes? We don't - though there's ample proof feminists will lash out, engage in misandry, acts of betrayal (sexual and otherwise) and basically be a "bitch" (their word) for no good reason - except to hurt those closest to them. But, somehow, I'm asked to feel sorry for these people because they, maybe, got a fucking shiner in return? Sorry. Tell me the whole story, in context, or leave it out of the media:
Kelly Bensimon leaving court today, after avoiding jail time for her domestic violence charge.
Blame it on the boyfriend.
(Actual photo)
Look at the above pictures. Note the masculinity, the hard-ass look in the eyes that says “it’s my way, period. You will be obedient and compliant or you will pay. I will dump you anytime I want, then bring you back anytime I want”.
An excerpt from People magazine:
Really now, how can two people disagree as to whether or not they are or were engaged?
Walk like a man, asshole. Get past the mentality of a lucky seventh grader who gets to bang the dirty, nasty teacher.
A wronged wife has taken revenge on her cheating husband by biting off his private parts.
She's a hissing, claws-out socialite on the hit Bravo reality show "Real Housewives of New York City," but Kelly Bensimon turned into a butt-kicking boyfriend beater in her posh lower-Manhattan coop last week, court records claim.
To this:
But nobody can say, exactly, how that happened.