The man who probably knows more about alternative medicine than anyone else has a question about how yoga studies are conducted and reported:
"Why do the authors claim that patients who regularly practiced yoga had a significantly better general health status, a higher physical functioning, and physical component score on the SF-36 than those who did not than those who did not? I know that the statement is strictly speaking correct, but why do they not write that “patients who had a significantly better general health status, a higher physical functioning, and physical component score on the SF-36 were more likely to practice yoga regularly”? After all, this too is correct! And why does the conclusion not state that better physical health seems to be associated with a greater likelihood of practicing yoga?
The possibility that the association is the other way round deserves serious consideration, in my view.
Is it not logical to assume that, if someone is relatively fit and healthy, he/she is more likely to take up yoga (or table-tennis, sky-diving, pole dancing, etc.)?
It’s perhaps not a hugely important point, so I will not dwell on it – but, as the alternative medicine literature is full with such subtly misleading statements, I don’t find it entirely irrelevant either."
Cultism never is.
Personally, I wouldn't practice anything that leads people to mislead others, subtly or otherwise,...
There are decent anecdotal stories of people who've cured/fixed various issues--muscular problems I mean--with yoga.
ReplyDeleteI can't think of the actresses name, but the woman who played Cuddy on House is one, for instance.
Doesn't mean yoga's any kind of cure-all, just means stretching and strengthening are good for you.