What To Do With White People Is Now A Trending Topic

Ayn Rand, white's conservative cultist of selfishness and national irresponsibility - along with all the others - should never have been resurrected

Thank goodness, oppressed culture's don't naturally roam to making slaves, sending people away in cattle cars, or firing squads, because America's caucasians would be in some trouble going forward in history. Of course, TMR (always ahead of the cultural curve) long ago switched to an all-white-all-the-time-call-out format, while Salon's Brittney Cooper has only recently gotten to the point where whites have her "utterly undone." But it's Jezebel's Brit Bennett, who finally confesses what everyone's thinking: "I Don't Know What to Do With Good White People." 

She's got me there, too, because - after my trial-by-fire with emersion in white "culture" - I now have a hard time identifying what "good" even means, in the shitshow that is white America revealed. I mean, considering what hardships whites are saddling blacks with, as I write this, would it be wrong for future generations to subject white's ever-more-unreasonable asses to slavery, cattle cars, and firing squads? White's obstinance (and laughter) in the face of our deaths, coupled with their historical willingness to see others suffer for their benefit, makes it a tough call. "Ethics," as we know it, becomes questionable in their presence - which, in a way, has always been the "good" white people's point. 

Confronting the weight, of living with 4 centuries of white bullshit, I just wrote something like the following, in an email, to a "good" white person a few days ago:

"They decry black Americans for embracing “victimology,” and they disparage women for “playing the victim,” whenever anyone identifies incidents or patterns of racial or sexual injustice. It is of crucial importance to the right-wing project of constructing a society of solipsism to sketch a victimless world of capitalistic purity. If there are no victims, institutions are irrelevant, and there are no victimizers. If there are no victimizers, there is no need for external agitation from democratic organization or government enforcement of fair and consistent standards under the law."

Reading "a society of solipsism" really brings the point home, for me, because that's what TMR's been blogging about this place for almost a decade. This "modern" society that said the late (and suicidal) Spalding Gray was "brilliant" as he talked about pot affecting his "kundalini," and made multiple con men and women rich selling "The Secret," but today calls Will Smith's Scientology-schooled kids "crazy" for spouting the same inherited garbage everyone was applauding as they grew. (Picking on the black kids really brings the cowardice of these people, not to mention their corrosive racial dynamics, into view.) I could say, "make up your minds, people!" but I'm no longer sure many others have one - or ever have. It's just been my slow torture, equal to anything I've read in the recent report that's got everyone so outraged, now. You've all become Dick Cheney, dripping with evil and the stench of death, to me.

And the world turns. By 2044, whites will be the minority and the kids of these monstrosities, who will be spouting THEIR PARENT'S inherited nonsense, won't have the cover of their parent's superior numbers - so what to do? I imagine future generations will be at a loss, because protecting those who've always been hurting blacks, merely to protect their egos, won't be a winning proposition to the formally oppressed. White's perversion of MLK's teachings are already causing non-violence to lose it's currency and, after another 30 years, and faced with this already-heavily-armed white population, I can't see how it'll last. (If whites don't believe in non-violence - and their heavily-advertised and newly-purchased arsenals clearly say they don't - why will anyone else?)

And it's today's remorseless "good" white people, through their open hostility and willful inaction, that will have made it so. They demanded it be this way, and everyone's finally heard them, and these "others" will have no choice but to respond accordingly.

I guess, looking at it objectively, only a very-pre-emptive "congratulations" - for any future carnage to caucasians - are all that can reasonably be offered,...

Why Ann Althouse? Why The Cops? Why Dick Cheney?

Because, from top to bottom, these whites are living by the exact same rules as dictators and terrorists:

”Don’t back down. Admit no doubt. Show no humanity.”

And that's while they, too, are killing,...

Blacks Suffer While Whites Make Up Their Minds On It II

Police know their history as slave catchers - it's their supporters who are in denial

So yesterday, after writing "Blacks Suffer While Whites Make Up Their Minds On It," I floated around several topics animating this racist society (you'd have to click the links to "get" the post) because, let's face it - until whites decide what's important IS important - there's nothing else, besides "floating," for most blacks to do. (I'm not Ta-Nehisi Coates or Jamelle Bouie with a platform, but a single, incisive, and aggrieved black with an unread blog - a truth for which white folks ARE responsible and should probably be eternally grateful,....) But some whites DO have eyes to see. Here's Civil rights historian Jason Sokol on racism's difference in the North and the South:

"I think the results of the racism, in the end, were fairly similar,...the racism was more covert in the North, which is I think how some people think of it. 

One important thing to realize is that many white Northerners basically believe that they weren’t segregationists, even if they were pursuing policies that led to segregation,..."

The police want an apology for blacks caring about our lives

It's all the same "in the end". Now, as a black person trying to live my life while facing these people, what am I supposed to do? Assure them they're O.K. as they screw me over - still? Shit - they KNOW what they're doing - they just don't want to face anyone black who will admit it to their complacent faces.

Americans know full well that our prisons are cesspools of abuse and sexual assault. They just don’t care.
— Jamelle Bouie (@jbouie) December 16, 2014

White people, living in their bubbles of enforced stupidity, care about what they care about. That's their perspective: they sit on our stolen goods and "decide" what they care about - because we can't thrust reality in their faces, like they force blacks to contend with it. So they "care" about the slaughter of kids - in fucking Pakistan - while black kids die, here, by their hands (since the police are their executioners) every day.

The evidence of white's true interests are everywhere

And it's all so obvious, it hurts. Here's the law professor, Ann Althouse, on Dick Cheney's appearance:

”Dick Cheney went on 'Meet the Press' yesterday to talk tough, and he was rock solid, unshakable.”

Blacks are playing no favorites - whites can't say that

What a lie - Meade's probably: there was NOTHING but desperation in Cheney's performance, of course, and TMR said so. Here’s Althouse today, quoting The Washington Post:

”3 Pinocchios for Dick Cheney's assertion that we did not prosecute Japanese soldiers for waterboarding.”

Whites have made their own North Korea

Because that’s how it’s done where whites are protected - they can be wrong and not wrong. Racists and not racists. History must have their “happy” ending. But how can American blacks make any head-way, while we’re alive and suffering, trying to reason with such insane people?

Avoiding crazy people, or shutting them down, are the only options we've got

I have to ask - again: is it any wonder Alzheimer’s is so prevalent in whites, considering how much effort they put into trying to uphold the imagery of purity over the racist reality, while making everyone else suffer for it around them?

Dick Cheney's Scared: Because His Answers R Evasive

Not a single direct answer in the entire interview? Wow - watch your heart, Old Man:

Prosecutors should be paying attention,...

Fox News' Megyn Kelly Rattled Dick Cheney Last Night

Alright, fine, Jesus is white:

As long as he doesn't play softball,...

Jon Stewart On Obama's Language Malfunction: "Can We Afford That And The Royalty Checks You’re Going To Send To George Orwell?"

The Daily Show - Slashdance - Democratic Deficit Reduction Plan
Tags: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

You know, it's weird. All during the Bush years, I patiently explained to my liberal friends, both here and in France, why the president was doing this or that. Not that it did any good, because they knew - they knew - both George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were really into devouring children and not to be trusted. Actually, not being deep readers, they didn't know anything - they (also being NewAge pawns) merely felt it - and they weren't going to let a little thing like "facts" get in the way of their imaginations on the run.

Except for the frustration of dealing with imbeciles, I didn't mind talking to such people about what Bush was doing because A) they were my (soon to be ex) friends, B) I understood it, and C) I was proud of, and genuinely liked the president, so, except for reinforcing a reputation for being "someone who likes to argue" (remember: I'm debating people who weren't going beyond media portrayals and weren't to be diverted from their feelings about those portrayals or me) I accept and claim everything Bush did, and my support for it, without reservation.

Now, compare that with the Obots - including Jon Stewart. Here he is, telling us the guy he helped propel to office is lying to us - and breaking a major campaign promise - but there's not a single word of explanation or personal responsibility, from Stewart or anyone else, for bringing us to this. I mean, does it get any worse than saying your choice for president is like a character from "1984"? And I don't have to tell anyone I "feel" this is what's happening - Jon Stewart is telling me himself!

But what Jon Stewart won't say is he was wrong to support the guy, he was wrong to convince others into supporting the guy, or that he may have also had that Bush thing (that supposedly brought the liar to power) all wrong to begin with - because he, Jon Stewart, comedian and media monkey, felt he had it right at the time.

No, instead Jon Stewart will just report Obama's a bald-faced liar, and then pretend I don't notice his hypocrisy. He thinks he's got it covered by calling the whole thing "Orwellian".

I call it The New York Times Approach.

Truth Is Scary: Vinnie Paz (He's Been Saying It!)

I love Truth Is Scary because they get rappers to divulge the most bizarre conspiracy theories. Here, Vinnie Paz goes off on chemtrails, crop circles, the New World Order, 2012, and Barack Obama as a member of the Illuminati (who can leave out the Illuminati?) all said with the confidence of a true believer - like, if you don't know this shit, then you're the one who's out there. Umm hmm.

Oh well, not a great statement on our education system (will they ever introduce critical thinking?) but one hell of a good time. The truth is scary:

This is what people believe.

Liberals: Just Lovin' The Hate (& Being Haightful)

And people wonder why I call them Nazis - look at her:

Everyone there is amazed she's laughing, but she's not only laughing, she actually thinks a cruel, stale, David Letterman joke - that wasn't even funny 8 years ago - is hilarious!

Add in all the other things Libs have in common with Nazis and, I'm sorry, but the title fits too well. (Leftists probably never took it seriously, when historians said the Germans of the Third Reich were just normal everyday people, that they meant someone like themselves, but I've seen enough to know exactly what they meant.) Their love for "ancient teachings", worship of the Earth, "alternative" medicine, overturning elections, death threats and marches, and on and on and on:

They'd go whole hog without a thought (clearly) if given the opportunity.

Click on the tags, below, for more.

UPDATE: Here's another clip I got from Hot Air, with Joe saying Obama should apologize for what he, and his supporters said about Bush and Cheney during the election, before Obama went on to hypocritically do everything they did. But, of course, no one who called them evil, or said they were shredding the constitution, will apologize because, as we all know, Nazis never quit:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

If I Can't Trust FRONTLINE Who Can I Trust?

Watch the full episode. See more FRONTLINE.

Right now the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is scared because, along with their divisions PBS and NPR, they know they're being shown the door. The main reason it's happening is an end to government waste, but along with that is conservative's burning hatred for the liberalism they've been expected to subsidize.

I know this hatred well. For me it's mostly directed at their Louise Hay-produced NewAge programming during pledge drives, but, for instance, also for the way Garrison Keillor, for no apparent or damned good reason, would destroy the pure Americana of A Prairie Home Companion buy interjecting ugly partisan jabs at conservatives during the broadcast.

I just stopped listening.

Various figures associated with the CPB claim they're non-partisan, but, as a longtime listener/viewer I don't buy it. They can't help themselves. For instance, I remember the episode of FRONTLINE, above, bothered me greatly. It bothered me because I thought, at the time, it was unfair. I haven't re-watched it, but here are a few thoughts I can remember flashing through my mind, and one that occurs considering more recent developments:

If Vice-President Cheney was "restoring" presidential power to the what the framers intended, why are his efforts portrayed as "enhancing" - as though President Bush was getting something more than the framers intended?

If Cheney's lawyer, David Addington, had "experience in all of the matters", as well as "very well grounded views", why are he and Cheney's efforts treated as suspect in this episode? Why the ominous music for "very well grounded views"?

Why is restoring the executive called "extraordinary"?

Now that President Obama has signed on for military tribunals and the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, in hindsight, is the portrayal here fair to the Bush administration? And if not, then why not, if FRONTLINE is considered the gold standard of investigative programs in America?

Here's an episode on "alternative" medicine (unfortunately, I can't embed it in the post). Since I know there aren't two sides to this story, why - except for something like Louise Hay's money - does FRONTLINE present it as though there were?

We Say This Is A Nice Profile For Mt. Rushmore

This one man has been more important to the world than all of his detractors combined:

A small, controversial effort launched under President George W. Bush to fund and train election monitors in Egypt played a key role in the movement to topple President Hosni Mubarak’s regime.

The program, which provided millions in direct funding to prodemocracy groups, helped dispatch 13,000 volunteers to observe Egypt’s parliamentary elections in December. Thousands of those monitors, angered by what they said was blatant election rigging, joined the protests. Some became outspoken leaders; others used the networking and communication skills they learned to help coordinate 18 days of rallies.

“The very fact that they saw the fraud firsthand has contributed to them turning from monitors into activists,’’ said Saad Eddin Ibrahim, founder of the Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies, which has used a share of the US funds to train volunteers. “They became very disillusioned with the regime.’’

The evolving role of the monitors provides a measure of vindication for Bush administration officials and allies, including Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney, who fought for permission to funnel money to the monitors, bucking a longstanding US policy of giving Egypt a veto over US funds.

“I certainly feel vindicated,’’ said Charles King Mallory IV, a former aide to Elizabeth Cheney, who could not be reached for comment.

Bit by bit, as time goes by, we're going to continue find that every critic of the Bush administration - including the current president and his supporters - were on the wrong side of history.

Not that they'll ever admit it.

One More Time (For Old Times Sake)

Ahh yes, former Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean, proven (once again) he's a jackass and a liar - the very qualities that made him a *perfect* leader of the Left during the Bush years - willing to spread any falsehood that leaps into that totally delusional ever-burning yee-haw brain of his, and all because his super-gullible pea-brained "progressive" supporters will believe anything he says - anything! - as long as it starts with the words FOX News.

Tell me, people: how would the Bush years have gone if the "progressives" had known (or cared) about the truth? Would we have heard, repeatedly, that it was Dick Cheney and/or Scooter Libby (either one would do for this particular lie) that leaked Valerie Plames' name to the press - when it was really a Democrat?

Oh, never mind. They're too stupid to care. Integrity means nothing to them. And I've been down this road too many times before.

They've got their black version of Bozo in office, and we're all suffering now, and really - really - isn't that all that matters?

Hat Tip: NewsBusters

Tom Cruisin' For A Bruisin' (Using The Oh So Vastly Superior L. Ron Hubbard "C" Method)

Check this silliness out:

Know how I'm always telling you celebrities are stupid? And, by now, you also know I'll diss a Scientologist 'till the cows come home, correct? Well, I've got more proof both my outlook, and approach, are accurate:

Greta Van Susteren, that Scientologist news anchor for the hated FOX News who, like Rachel Maddow, talks out of the side of her mouth like Dick Cheney (sexy!) recently got called on her stupidity by one of her viewers:

"Greta,

You got that right, you have a mind like a seive. Your brain is empty.

Matter of fact, it is so empty, if you put a pea in your skull it would rattle around like a BB in a boxcar. You said it, gal, not me, but I sure do agree with you. A true blonde.

Brian ***
Tahlequah, OK

PS How do you get that cush job, anyway?"

So how did this brilliant cultist, Miss Van Susteren - using L. Ron Hubbard's NewAge "technologies" - respond? Hoping to embarrass the guy (which shouldn't have been hard since he couldn't even spell "sieve") this media savvy Scientologist erected a poll on her blog - asking, between she and Brian, "Who is dumber?" - and Greta won! By 67%!

I swear, I can't make this stuff up! I wouldn't even try.

But, then, I don't have to:

Like I said, I've been telling you celebrities and cultists are stupid for years,...

Maxine Is Good (At Eating Her Own Tongue)

Like a bridge over troubled Waters,...

Our 2001 Anthrax Suspect Fit Familiar Patterns

"After the Department of Justice last month formally closed its probe of the 2001 anthrax attacks, the FBI released the first batch of documents detailing the years-long investigation that ended with officials concluding that Bruce Ivins, a government scientist who committed suicide in July 2008, was responsible for the mailings that killed five victims.

Despite being an FBI target, Ivins was often forthcoming about the details of his strange obsessions and private life. For example,...when agents executed search warrants in late-2007, an FBI supervisor asked Ivins if he was worried about those raids. Ivins said he was, noting that he did things a 'middle age man should not do,' adding that his actions would 'not be acceptable to most people.' He then noted that agents searching his basement would find a 'bag of material that he uses to "cross-dress,"' according to an interview report. During a January 2008 meeting with agents, Ivins described his bizarre decades-long 'obsession' with the Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority, and detailed how he broke into two KKG chapters to steal ritual books used by the group.

In a July 2008 e-mail, Ivins wrote that 'Dick Cheney scares me. The Patriot Act is so unconstitutional it's not even funny.' He added, 'I'm voting for Obama!'"

-- The Smoking Gun

The World's Terrorist Fist Bump For The Big Guy

"Dick Cheney is a refreshingly forceful advocate of American exceptionalism, and the idea that the United States is a special country with a unique role to play in shaping history. He also understands the importance of maintaining and strengthening America’s key alliances. Unlike Obama, Cheney is a dedicated supporter of the Anglo-American alliance, and understands the importance of the Special Relationship as the central bulwark in the defence of the free world. He cherishes the friendship with Great Britain, and recognizes the huge contribution she continues to play in fighting alongside the United States, from Iraq to Afghanistan.

Perhaps most strikingly, Dick Cheney, like Ronald Reagan before him and in complete contrast to Barack Obama, views the world in terms of good and evil. For Cheney, engagement with America’s enemies such as Iran and North Korea is a surrender of American global power, and a shameful abdication of responsibility by the world’s only superpower. In this new era of appeasement, Cheney’s outspoken criticism, like that of conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer, is increasingly striking a chord with an American public that is sharply turning against the Obama administration’s agenda.

Dick Cheney has become an extraordinarily influential game-changer in post-Bush Washington, emerging as Barack Obama’s leading nemesis on national security. It is not hard to see why. He is a formidable figure of tremendous principle, an unapologetic and uncompromising patriot who believes in the greatness of America on the world stage, as well as a shamelessly old-fashioned political pugilist in a modern age dominated by carefully choreographed spin. In the political arena today Cheney remains a sure-footed Rocky Balboa, landing punch after punch on his opponents. His latest intervention is another well-placed blow to Obama’s flailing leadership, and once again puts the White House firmly on the back foot."

-- Nile Gardiner, giving "Uncle Dick" his due - there probably isn't a better living American politician today (other than W., his former boss) - because, in a world of dicks, pussies and assholes, we know where we stand, like The Telegraph.

Mouth Guard

So I was, finally, getting a sound sleep when I got a call from an old friend.

Fortunately, I still like him, even though he's a drug addict and criminal who's been been institutionalized several times.

Typical shit from my liberal days.

I groggily said "Hey, Dude" and, before I could ask how he's doing, he's like "Fuck you", which is the traditional greeting of MKOGs (My Kind Of Guys) and he asks how I'm doing.

I thought, "O.K., this is new,...."

I tell him I'm O.K.: "Still having nightmares, and my truck is in the shop, but, all-in-all, holding it together. How 'bout you?"

That's when he told me his latest tale of madness, involving the drugs, and the police, and his pitbull, and a girl he picked up and fell in loooove with (after the ritualized anal sex) and, of course, his Mom. Then he started to cry because he said he missed me.

Typical liberal bullshit.

The other day, my lunch was interrupted by three guys at the next table, supposedly trying to have what they called an "intelligent" conversation.

One said Israel had better give in to Islam or there was going to be Hell to pay. According to this yokel, Israel had no choice.

Another kept saying he wanted to make a point - he had to be heard, damn it - and his point was that President Bush was in on 9/11, but it was Dick Cheney who planned the whole thing:

Bush was just the vice-president's puppet and didn't really know what had been going on. The former two-term President of the United States was just too dumb for all that.

The third guy was insisting none of that mattered because the world was going to end by 2012 - the Mayan calendar said so. He claimed it was science.

I lost my appetite, wrapped up my meal, and went back to work; hoping I'd feel like eating it later.

What I meant when I told my friend I'm O.K., is that, now that I'm divorced, a lot of this crazy crap is happening somewhere else, and to someone else, now.

I'm a full-blown conservative - having swung so far to the extreme Left that I've survived to emerge on the Right - and less of this insanity is my reality these days.

I'm, mostly, just a witness to the nonsense now.

When I was on the Left, almost everybody I met thought I was a genius.

Now that I'm on the Right, those same people think I've "lost the plot", and that I'm not a man anymore - like I'm faking it with this "Macho" stuff. And, online, they waste no time telling me so. They're trying to get to me, like I'm Sarah Palin.

Whatever.



Speaking of Sarah Palin, yesterday, right before work, I was having my coffee and cigarette, just looking out at the sky, when I heard her voice from the Republican Convention, saying, "The difference between a Hockey Mom and a pitbull? Lipstick."

The memory almost brought tears to my eyes.

I somehow went out and worked harder than I have in a long, long time. Just really digging in. And it felt good.

Because so many Leftists are against her, a lot of Republicans are wondering if Palin's going to run for president in 2012,....is she going to be the next one to dig in - and possibly end the liberal hold on American culture?

I don't know about anybody else but - at this point in my life - that particular woman, ending what's left of the liberal hold on America, would suit this conservative just fine.