Presidential inaugurations are supposed to feel better than this, but, having spent 20 years married to a cultist - and 30 years living in the cult capital of the world, San Francisco, California - I'm having a difficult time wrapping my head around the "logic" at work now, and I'm hoping someone can help me through it.
Like, if the Democrats in charge, now, ripped off elections with cult help, before, and without immediate detection, or any punishment what-so-ever in their entire history - even for that one - why is everyone pretending like it's the accusation they've got the will and the means to do so, again, that's bizarre?
The Democrat Party stole an election with the help of Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple, and then lied to turn one of the cult's creepier members, Harvey Milk, into a gay icon - all so they could write a bunch of new laws, that govern our lives, today. Can, and should, a political party that would lie, and then ride roughshod over everyone, to force us - all over the world - to live under a mountain of their lies, since the '70's, be trusted now?
Practice makes perfect, and the Democrats have been mostly practiced at lying. Highly accomplished, even. About rape and such things. The entire country knows it, left and right. The media just doesn't do it's job. Even Hillary gets away with it, as they insist she belongs in the White House for it, though few (outside of NewAge circles) can ever fathom why. But they think they explain elections.
The Democrat Party has armies of creepy "spiritual advisors" - to help them formulate the lies they tell us - and they've said so, openly.
This election result is more evidence the media's not doing it's job - and it's not doing it's job on behalf of The Democrat Party - that's also how they stole the election before, and Jim Jones was allowed to rule: cultists in journalism. Face it: when only one journalist could see the fraud at Theranos - after, literally, thousands had walked through their offices - our country has no true journalism, to speak of anymore.
For instance, how does trading Joe Biden - who wrongly imprisoned millions of blacks for 26 years - for President Trump (who was releasing wrongly imprisoned blacks with the help of Kim Kardashian) add up to progressing Civil Rights? Where are the papers to clear up THAT conundrum? What do you say, to the millions of wrongly imprisoned blacks, sitting in prison because of Joe Biden? "You're not black" like Joe Biden said? Really?
And does anyone sleep better at night, knowing the Vice President of the United States is a former U.S. Prosecutor, who's morals and intelligence are such, that she either did not care a U.S. Marine, posing as TV's talking-to-the-dead guy for most of the '90s, was a fraud? Or she couldn't tell? How? He was ripping off millions of vulnerable Americans, probably as this photo was taken. Is it comforting, that Kamala Harris is possibly THAT clueless, or corrupt?
President Trump didn't have small accomplishments - he wasn't mastering a yoga pose - but he nailed exactly the kind of big ones America wanted - like peace in the Middle East. The kind ordinary Americans understood. How does taking the U.S. - finally finding success in the world - away from the American people, constitute giving us good government?
And finally, all true Americans know for sure is, the best thing about Big Tech is - without facebook and Twitter - it's impossible for their NewAge Nazis to taunt us as (they think) they're getting away with something.
No comments:
Post a Comment
COMMENTS ARE BACK ON