"Could it really be true that my column about poor Meghan had helped drive her out of Britain? What an awful thought....it was unlikely – for a fairly simple reason. My column was published on December 19 last year, more than 11 months after Meghan announced she was stepping down as a senior royal. So unless Meghan has access to a time machine,..."
The Daily Telegraph’s Michael Deacon, who's article was partially blamed for chasing Meghan Markle from Britain, though it was written almost a year after she'd announced she was leaving. In other words, the NewAger told another lie.
And isn't Oprah a great NewAge "journalist" for including Deacon's article, without checking or questioning the date, herself? Her BFF is CBS' Gayle King, who saw the show beforehand, so should know, but - unable to see the Duchess can't stop lying - instead lied and said Meghan Markle is being "vilified".
But come on: back in the '90s was when NewAge Hillary Clinton's paranoid mind first lied there was "a vast rightwing conspiracy" - and it worked to save NewAge Bill Clinton's rape-y ass. And, of course, now there was "Russian Collusion" no one can find, with those lies apparently working so well, even Michelle Obama is proud of the results.
Of all their NewAge lying - and no one, holding anyone, accountable.
No comments:
Post a Comment
COMMENTS ARE BACK ON