In light of the 30th anniversary of The Peoples Temple massacre, I've been trying to figure out how to discuss the societal cultism I see, but in a way everyone can understand - without Leftists deciding I'm condemning each and every liberal.
Fortunately, good ol' Michael Shermer (probably the nicest scientist on the planet) has taken a shot at it - and done a pretty good job - in The Los Angeles Times, allowing me to merely add a few comments that can help define the position, and individuality, of TMR better. Here's part of what Shermer's written:
"Belief systems are coherent and logically consistent when you are inside them. It is not until you step outside the group and gain a different reference point that the coherence and logic vanishes,...
There also are well-known social psychological effects at work in these groups -- such as the loss of individuality and the compliance of behavior and conformity of thought under group pressure, along with the diffusion of individual responsibility and group think.
But there is something deeper going on here that I think touches on cognitive processes in all of us as members of non-cult groups, such as political parties: confirmation bias. This is when we look for and find evidence to support what we already believe, and ignore or rationalize away evidence that does not. And because we are so tribal by nature, we employ confirmation bias with extra vigor when it comes to defending the groups we belong to.
Republicans tend to listen to conservative talk radio, watch Fox News and read the Wall Street Journal, gathering data and noting arguments that support their political beliefs.
Democrats are more likely to listen to progressive talk radio and NPR, surf liberal blogs and read the New York Times. Everyone does it.
[Note: TMR takes issue with the "everybody does it" argument: I read, and listen to, everything - right and left, Rush and NPR, The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times - always noting wherever cultism is found: that's TMR's confirmation bias. I've noted that, though a conservative, I don't fit in any group - including skeptics - and, I think, that's the strength of this blog.
Despite that, which I think is obvious, liberals regularly use confirmation bias to dismiss my work because - like The Peoples Temple was a leftist group - I see most (though not all) of the cultism on the Left and, as a former Leftist, I'm determined to expose it. I'll let others rail about religious belief on the Right because there are many groups (from the left and right) doing that already. And, being a former leftist, I'm positive cultism on the Left is getting a free ride,...]
Confirmation bias explains why so many rumors about candidates were eagerly embraced recently. On the left, commentators glommed onto false gossip about Sarah Palin's ignorance (she doesn't know that Africa is a continent) and bigotry (she tried to ban books from the public library) because liberals think that conservatives are dumb and dogmatic, and after eight years of George W. Bush's malapropisms and Palin's interview fumbles, such rumors merely confirmed what liberals already believed.
On the right, conservatives were primed to process hearsay about Barack Obama being a Muslim or Arab as true, or that his tax plan -- indistinguishable from that of most Democratic candidates in recent decades -- confirmed that he's a socialist, even while Republicans were nationalizing the financial industry and running up record debts.
[Here, I think, Shermer makes the mistake of taking the one-time emergency event of the bailout and using it to confirm the idea that conservatives endorse socialism - an idea liberals support as an organizing principle of our society. This idea - that conservatives are endorsing socialism - is a bogus argument that, unfortunately, has gained a lot of traction.]
Research on confirmation bias has found that when subjects are presented with evidence that contradicts their deeply held beliefs, they dismiss it as invalid, while other subjects treat the same information as valuable when it confirms what they believe. In one study, for example, subjects were shown a video of a child taking a test. One group was told that the child was from a high socioeconomic class; the other group was told that the child was from a low socioeconomic class. The subjects were asked to evaluate the academic abilities of the child based on the results of the test. The child believed to be from the high socioeconomic group was rated as above grade level, but the child believed to be from the low socioeconomic group was rated as below grade level. Same data. Same kid. Different interpretations.
The confirmation bias sways us all, especially when it reinforces our inner tribalism. Most of us will never join a cult, but all of us are subject to the pull of believing that the evidence supports our most cherished beliefs. Inside Jonestown, Jim Jones' daily barrages confirmed to members that their cause was right and that ultimately death would bring about peace and justice.
It is for this reason that we need to look for disconfirmatory evidence, to listen to the arguments of those with whom we disagree, to ask for constructive criticism of our beliefs, and to remember Oliver Cromwell's words to the Church of Scotland in 1650: 'I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken.'"
And this is exactly what TMR is trying to do. It's critics (who even deny cultism exists in politics) can't get past my admitted-conservatism to see I'm attacking the cultism within liberalism - even after I admit I can't stand with the religious zealotry of those on the Right.
Liberals insist I have to hate George W. Bush in order to be O.K., and I say, no, demonizing the president is a symptom of the Left's cultism that does not allow them to see anything for what it is - especially the good the president's done. (Funny, how people who are always against hate don't mind it when they want to, isn't it?) That's their "confirmation bias" at work, and it's hurt the country, because very little has turned out as they say. (Iraq's a failure? Anyone?) The result of all that hate is the saddest commentary on our cultish times I can think of:
With Obama's presidency based on empty religion-based ideas of "believe" and "hope" and "change" - and produced as an antidote to a wrong-headed idea about Bush - I know America is now being prodded along by cultish beliefs and behavior. But they got what they wanted.
And Jim Jones couldn't have asked for a better memorial than that.
Note: Though I've collected information on a lot of important, crazy and related subjects, today's one post will have to do it for now. Without a significant increase in donations my attention has to be placed elsewhere (though there are 2, 350 posts here that need to be updated, linked, formatted, etc.) so you know what what I'm going to say - other than asking "How do liberals regularly find millions to fund their nonsense?" - this is The Crack Emcee for:
listen to the arguments of those with whom we disagree, to ask for constructive criticism of our beliefs, and to remember Oliver Cromwell's words to the Church of Scotland in 1650: 'I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken.ReplyDelete
It would be nice if you actually READ what you post.
It's just like you to take an expose such as this and use it as an attack on me - it's confirmation bias at it's best.
I notice you missed this part:
I read, and listen to, everything - right and left, Rush and NPR, The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times - always noting wherever cultism is found: that's TMR's confirmation bias. I've noted that, though a conservative, I don't fit in any group - including skeptics - and, I think, that's the strength of this blog.
Despite that, which I think is obvious, liberals regularly use confirmation bias to dismiss my work because - like The Peoples Temple was a leftist group - I see most (though not all) of the cultism on the Left and, as a former Leftist, I'm determined to expose it - I'll let others point out most on the right because there are many groups (from the left and right) doing that already.
The fact you ignore the mission of this blog - in favor of your own defense of cultishness in liberalism - says all I need to know about you. I told you before - you're walking a line with me - and I'm getting pretty sick of putting up with you. Keep it up and I won't bother talking to you.
I'm not Sean Hannity, so you'd be smart to stop treating that way.
oh yeah... I must have missed the part where youre fair and balanced. :)ReplyDelete
The obvious pandering of the GOP to the religious right has been a problem for quite sometime now. Personally, I blame Ronald Reagan, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson for the demise of the republican party as much as I blame Bush.ReplyDelete
Sadly, there are many Christians who use church leadership to do the thinking for them. I can remember receiving a pamphlet in church that had every pertinent candidates pro-life stance, and I, along with many others simply picked my candidates based on their opposition to abortion. There was no need to know where they stood on other issues. In conservative Christian circles, there was only one issue.
Now, having voted that way most of my life, I have to face the fact that it was naive and judgmental to try to legislate the moral decisions of others. My repentance came in the form of my vote for Mr. Obama.
The GOP base is made up of many people who have squandered their right to think for themselves as a way to feel more righteous; yet according to their belief systems, God is the one who gave them free will, and I don't think he did it just so they could surrender their intellect to James Dobson. My children, raised in the church, supported Mr. Obama, and are far more compassionate toward the people the Christian right taught them to disdain when they were young.
I believe millions of young people like my children are the future of the GOP, once it accepts and recognizes the worth of the millions of other Americans who might have different spiritual beliefs.